Journalism 301: Find the Facts

It may be time for a few corrections because over the years CLEO stupidity has manifest itself in many ways, in some cases altering my views and opinions. Assigning the designation of Alternate Universe for instance, is not as accurate as it could be. What I have observed is more akin to "Cop World" where whatever CLEOs can manage to put into a police report is supposed to be representative of something within the realm that more than 90% of the population considers to be reality. While it remains an Alternate Universe of sorts, it is purely a construct of those with similar motives and affiliations, but it doesn't constitute a Universe, only a rather sophomoric manifestation of what cops would like their reality to be.

It also probably isn't fair to imply that all security guards or county personnel are nose-pickers or Hags. There was a time when I didn't think so, but unfortunately only those with hostile intentions have approached me or performed their duties since May of 2007 due to the agenda described here. There are also probably a lot of good people that decided that the military was their best, if not only, option for employment in a failing economy. The "slime" that I have referred to here have primarily been those amongst the Whitcraft generation, many of them no longer with us. However, I have been dismayed by the fact that many of their progeny have been the primary perpetrators of many of the criminal offenses that went unprosecuted, obviously directed by their immediate relations. I haven't named a lot of them, but when Ms. Smith was mentioned, it was intended to be a prelude to demonstrating a common denominator that runs throughout this sordid account.

The fact that such a narrow range of the population was responsible for the various forms of falsifications and fabrications is not a coincidence, nor is the fact that the entire scam was intended to erroneously establish that your humble writer as a member of their ranks (although I continue to find it amusing that they see this as means of degradation, the same way that cops did when they entered bogus information into their databases). What, after all, was wrong with a reasonably well-educated guy without a significant criminal record, gainfully employed, or the fact that he was never a member of the military (which is what I was until Michael E. Bartley was issued a fraudulent ID on September 20, 1996?) Who had a problem with that? That is the question that includes the elusive Who and Why that has been concealed, along with various Whats that include the official records shared by law enforcement and government officials; records that have been used against me but never actually documented which precludes contesting any of it. This is another pattern that has run consistently throughout; concealing the pertinent facts, identities of complainants, and the records as a strategy to protect the perpetrators from culpability or liability. (Typical of the cowardly nature of those that use slander as a tactical device and straight out of the Whitcraft Field Manual).

It has always been obvious that theft and destruction of evidence was conditional to any portrayal of your humble writer as any of the above and the entire storyline that included an alleged "residential burglary" wasn't going to work for more than another decade; until after all the evidence of my identity had been stolen, destroyed or misappropriated. It is also obvious that all of those involved with bogus complaints, thefts, phony database entries, phantom "arrests" and the other elements, mostly propelled by police reports sans court records that correlate to them, were connected. Easily connected, in fact, not some random configuration of objective observers who just happened to be around when a specific complaint, report, theft or allegation was made. No one amongst the 90% of the population that didn't have knowledge of the various scams it took to perpetrate any of the frauds or misrepresentations, has ever been part of the official records or CLEO storylines. In other words, the only people that have contributed to falsehoods, misrepresentations, bogus complaints or allegations of criminality have been confined to those with common motives and affiliations, or CLEO stooges that started showing up, not coincidentally, just after the initial theft report in May 1997.

But the questions that are obvious and continue to remain unanswered, actually clarify the agenda in retrospect. What happened to Michael E. Bartley? Did he not have a lengthy criminal record prior to 1997? Was he not in the Navy? Did he not exist? What is the storyline anyway and why was it concealed until after the thefts that preceded all of this? No one has ever mentioned anything to me about military service, and the notion of it is ludicrous. I would have left the country without hesitation if I had ever been subject to the draft, which I wasn't, and there is no doubt whatsoever that any and all scholastic achievement could be duplicated with ease. This is stupid and ill-conceived, as phony as Lasher's narrative. Is the entire population supposed to be too stupid to think that cops would copy and paste a photo once the original was targeted and destroyed? Couldn't happen because cops would never do such a thing? Bullshit.

And why has the response to my efforts to investigate these things on my own, despite stonewalling and mindless attacks on my person and property, been some sort of investigation or police response? Because the primary perps were all cops and prosecutors? I guess that makes sense, but all I have done is piece together what appears to be someone's idea of a brilliant plan that was completely reliant on access to official databases, thefts and misrepresentations. All of the participants appear to have the same motives and affiliations and all of them gained financially or in some other tangible manner in exchange for lying, stealing, fabricating or misrepresenting something that was necessary to lend support to phony police reports and database entries that preceded all of this.

So I'm supposed to be Dr. Evil because I started asking some questions, looking for information, seeking judicial review, when it was obvious that theft, destruction and corruption of evidence was clearly orchestrated for transparent reasons? I'm supposed to conform to Michael E. Bartley's profile because a couple of ex-military cops cooked up a comical police report with a cheap computer? I'm supposed to be stupid and uneducated because Michael E. Bartley was in the military? I'm supposed to be engaged in illegal activity for the benefit and convenience of PMAPS and CLEOs? The Perpetual Investigation and harassment by military slime is permanent because the people that planned this are a bunch of screw-ups?

I'm the only guy who isn't breaking the law, the only guy who has a legitimate reason to conduct an investigation, and it is the people that I am investigating for journalistic purposes that are the ones involved in covering their tracks, concealing their identities or their statements, reports or database entries. 

© humble journalist

CLEO Comedy (Part III)

When I post the essay "Preachers and Punks" it was, as described, an metaphorical reference to the politicos and military slime that I consider to be primary perpetrators of the various scams described here. None of them would have been possible without PMAPS, who are in generally politicians as Mr. Cooley recently demonstrated, and military slime that had found their way into law enforcement positions. Along the way, of course, we've also seen the participation of County Hags and others who all happen to work for the counties with the most culpability and liability, otherwise known as motive.

But it was also a test of CLEO Comics, who as I have pointed out, have consistently mimicked these essays with the direction of typical CLEOs stooges, dirtbags and posers who necessarily accompany these contrived storylines. Of course, it wasn't long before I saw "preachers" showing up for proximity poses, some carrying Bibles or other literature, and America's Future in the form of Mini-dirtbags doing the same, many clad in the ridiculous costumes that were noted long ago.

Since this experimental exercise in testing CLEO stupidity, there are but two possibilities that I can think of. One, that CLEOs believe that the annoyance of these people, the obvious mimicry in particular, is intended to thwart my descriptive accounts. The other possibility is that CLEOs are actually serious about a storyline that includes a "secret code" component. Now somehow envisioning CLEOs standing before the judiciary trying to sell this load of CLEO bullshit is amusing beyond words, but I will try anyway. How would it go?

"Look, Your Honor, when he writes something like 'Preachers and Punks' all the stooges understand this 'secret code' and in this way, in his typically devious manner, orchestrates a nefarious scheme to conduct his illegal activity right in front of super-covert law enforcement surveillance apparatus. Not only that, he's corrupted America's religious institutions and our children, (that we sometimes chuck into bathrooms and leave the area when he takes a piss). Yes, Your Honor, if it weren't for our super-refined law enforcement skills and training, we never would have discovered this plot to destroy the fabric of America, and indeed engage in patently illegal activities which we are bound by oath to stop in our capacity as law enforcement officials."

Uh, yeah, OK.

In any case, it will have to remain an open question for the time being, but while the CLEO Comedy continues we have been served some more hors d'oeuvres from the CLEO menu which can be accurately described and documented. On this day, September 16, 2011, CLEO stooges were out early, literally stationed all along route to write this essay. We saw the usual suspects, cell phones at the ready, and as near as I can tell many bogus complaints may have been made before my usual two cups of coffee kicked in. The cops, and the other perpetrators described here, are clearly restless. It also appears that the IP Scam is indeed prevailing as a component of the CLEO Comedy. I was redirected once again, trying to access this account, and I would expect that the devices and tactics used by County Criminals and their ilk continue.

We have also been presented with another example of false attribution, typical of CLEO tactics, and necessarily reliant on County Hags and the processes of those with the most culpability and liability; those with common motives and affiliations; those that provide themselves with opportunities by way of their status and positions of authority. Proving that CLEO scams are always in progress, I was presented with a stack of forms to sign at County Hag Central on September 13, 2011. I proceeded to sign those forms as instructed, but it wasn't until after those forms were removed from my possession that it occurred to me that I had once again become a victim of CLEO Conniving. (I should know better by now, huh?) The County Hag who identified herself as Ms. Garcia, asked another patron if he had been in the military, a question that wasn't directed to me.

At that point, I realized that the same question was on a form that had been presented to me on another occasion, and that Ms. Garcia had filled in the form in my stead after I had signed it along with a bunch of others. So I asked her, "Why didn't you ask me that?" and she quickly responded, "OK, were you ever in the military?" and of course I answered truthfully, "No, I was not." But alas, the form had already been completed by Ms. Garcia, and she made no effort to either enter that information, or to correct what had already been entered on the form. (This is journalistic red meat). So what did Ms. Garcia enter when she took the liberty of filling in the form without my participation, then refusing to allow me to review it after she had done so?

Do you think it is possible that once again the CLEO community has falsified an official document, used their authority to take possession of a form with my signature on it to provide themselves with the "evidence" of falsehoods that serve their purposes, consistent with their agenda? Did the County of Los Angeles once again come up with a Switcheroo Scam to accomplish that, a sleight-of-hand that relied on the confusion over the forms that were handed to me? Your humble writer, being rather adept at identifying CLEO Scams, and also knowledgeable of proper, lawful procedures, will make the effort to ascertain this information, and as always, report the findings here.

Of course, this almost always means that the offenders will steadfastly refuse to provide any information on the subject, then launch into an attack that usually includes some reference to my "attitude" or my conduct at the point where this information is requested. Often, as we have noted in the past, and Ms. Garcia demonstrated once again, that inquiring about these things is usually accompanied by a threat of a police response. (On this occasion, County Hag Garcia told me that to inquire further was making her "job more difficult" and to continue this line of questioning would result in your humble writer being "escorted from the building" by County law enforcement officials). No shit? Where have we heard that line before?

For that reason, I think it is reasonable to assume that, yes, another CLEO Scam by the usual suspects was perpetrated by those with similar motives and affiliations. But in the interest of journalistic integrity, this commentary is accompanied by the caveat that the content of the form remains a matter of speculation, but the Who, When, Where and How have been answered. This leaves What was entered, and of course the Why once it is determined the information Ms. Garcia entered without my participation, without my knowledge, and without an opportunity, lawful and proper by any standard, to review that document.

© humble journalist

Stuck On Stupid: CLEO Policy

Let us return to the Path of Enlightenment because stuck on stupid is not a destination; it is a state of mind where anything that law enforcement can put into a police report, or convince anyone outside of their purview, is in fact truthful of accurate, becomes reality. It is reliant on the alleged "credibility" of these people, ill-founded and misdirected based on my experience. That is the topic of discussion of these essays. Nothing more.

To make one of the primary points, I have noted that the entire fiasco began with a falsified police report sans court records, reference numbers or any other substance that would allow for judicial review. When I learned that Michael E. Bartley had been arrested with a fraudulent ID, I purchased the police report and brought it along to the identity hearing along with all of the other documentation I could gather which included the records of his previous criminal activity in San Diego. Even prior to that, the response by law enforcement was hostile and misguided, Margaret Remsburg accused me of making a threat which in the context of the phone call, made no sense whatsoever. But this was a demonstration of the pattern that I am describing here. The use of tactical slander as a defense mechanism, authority used as means of eliminating adversaries or critics as well as the evidence of misconduct. An elaborate, but methodical, means of obstructing justice and obviating the First and Fourth Amendments to the Constitution (as well as violation of many of the provisions of the U.S. Code).

The allegation here is that the California DMV fraudulently issued two forms of ID to a guy with a lengthy criminal record. In fact, reputable news organizations, based on the review of internal DMV records, prove that a million or so such IDs were issued by the California DMV during Dan Lungren's tenure as AG. But instead of acknowledging this simple point of fact, the response was to make a bogus allegation against your humble writer. In other words, forget about a million fraudulent IDs or how they ruined the lives of those who were victimized by DMV clerks; people that found out as I did that there was no recourse because state employees enjoyed immunity and were never subject to prosecution. The issue somehow became one guy allegedly making an unsubstantiated "threat" against a DMV employee. And so the pattern of conduct was established.

Since then, I have reviewed all of the available documentation and court records and concluded that there is little doubt that a rather elaborate scam was in progress, those involved clearly collaborative with similar motives, the object being to assign Michael E. Bartley's criminal record to me which is supported by the fact that the thumbprint that identified him as the perpetrator does not belong to me, the physical description is not even close to my own, the fact that an AKA cannot refer to a victim and perpetrator, and the assignment of Bartley's DA number to me at a time when I had no DA number for good reason.

Now we travel back to the present with Professor Peabody and find that law enforcement tactics have not changed. In May of 2007 just prior to making a formal report of the theft of personal belongings, I was essentially robbed of key evidence that was intended for court review by law enforcement officials using color of authority, (based on a specious complaint by two military slimeballs who showed up a few minutes after I ordered some lunch). The California DL that was current and valid between 2000-04 was targeted and stolen. Two days later, Sierra Madre Police and County of Los Angeles officials again used their authority to access, then steal personal belongings and documentation, and copied files which showed up later in a corrupted form, again on specious grounds.

Along the way I made every attempt to have these issues resolved in the proper venue, the courts, and offered those named or described here an opportunity to make their rebuttals. I have even offered to submit to polygraph test if any of those named or described would care to join me to dispute any point of fact described in these essay. Instead, law enforcement has validated one of my primary points on the Path of Enlightenment; that all of these common procedures that were designed to clarify or reconcile disputes over points of fact have been conspicuously avoided for transparent reasons. Instead, I find children unattended in restrooms, military slime and stalkers chasing me to make bogus complaints, cops falsifying reports with obvious motives for doing so, and all the other forms of false attribution described earlier as a response.

In other words, nothing has changed. The modus operandi by those with shared motives and affiliations has been a constant series of attacks on my person, property, reputation and even my background and criminal history as an expedient means of deflecting attention from that which is reported here. I have criticized law enforcement officials. But this discussion, with exceptions for the notable day-to-day examples of CLEO tactics, actually a series of attacks or harassment by CLEO stooges, proxies and military slime, is really about the First and Fourth Amendments. At more than a dozen junctures, law enforcement has essentially stolen all the property I accrued in my lifetime, either directly or by proxy, so the Fourth Amendment is a moot point.

But the First Amendment is not. What the law enforcement community has executed is a methodical means of obviating it. In other words, the First Amendment, validated and codified on countless occasions by the Supreme Court, says that freedom of speech is broad and inclusive. But you better not criticize Steve Cooley or report simple matters of fact that pertain to PMAPS misconduct or you will be targeted and accused. You can desecrate the flag, but you better not say anything about falsified police reports being ridiculously contrived for transparent reasons or mention the common affiliations and motives of those involved. You can march down the street in a Nazi uniform in a Jewish neighborhood, but you better not call attention to the fact that Paul "Pffft" and his bogus DA Number Scam were clearly malicious and intentional. You can criticize anyone or anything you want, except for prosecutors and cops, because they have the authority to kidnap, steal, fabricate, falsify, plant and use tactical slander as necessary to f*** you over, lock you up, steal your belongings, and since PMAPS get to decide how The Law is applied, what the definition of Equal Protection means in practical terms, there is no one besides the judiciary that can protect you , not even the Constitution or the Amendments that were specifically designed to prevent abuses by law enforcement officials for exactly the reasons I've described here.

So the Accusing Fingers have only increased since Margaret Remsburg tried to deflect attention from the felonious activities of DMV employees, never addressing the simple facts derived from my experience and the documentation that supports my analysis and commentary. As long as law enforcement has an unlimited supply of whores, CLEO stooges, liars for hire, blank police reports, and their investigative authority, they can fabricate any sort of storyline they want because they control the stooges and the environment. "Book-em Dan-O" Lasher's phony police report and the comical narrative is the primary example of how it is done (and how it has resulted in the formation of Mt. CLEO since).

There are certain limitations of course, as noted in "Crimes of Convenience" earlier. They can't say I stole a car because they can't plant it on me. They can't say I robbed a bank or a convenience store because the video would disprove it. But they can make any allegation they want as long as it can't be disproven, like what occurred in a restroom when a crooked cop picked up something he'd dropped on the floor moments before, and they can have a CLEO stooge rob a bank or a convenience store and falsely attribute it to me by way of a bogus "association" (which can be the only reason why more than 17,500 CLEO stooges have chased me around in costumes making cell calls). The Accusing Fingers, more than 23 million ex-military slime (read cowardly thieves, frauds and perjurers as well as anyone they can pay off to do their bidding), supported by CLEOs with an unlimited supply of blank police reports, become formidable adversaries.

But all of this bullshit is no different than the tactical response by Margaret Remsburg in 1997; a means of deflecting culpability and liability in a contrived and specious manner. And none of it changes a single fact that is accurately reported here, nor has there been any legitimate challenge by the Accusing Fingers since I walked out of the identity hearing a few days after Remsburg's bogus allegation. Nor has any byproduct of law enforcement officials since resembled a truthful or accurate representation of anything that pertains to me.

© humble journalist

Prepare Secret Code Rings: Mission Possible

Well, ladies and geraniums, the time has come to divulge the "Secret Plan" that will explain all of the suspicious behavior we've been witnessing. Everyone get out your Secret Code Ring, put on your Mr. Blackwell outfit, pose in front of surveillance camera and be sure to look suspicious as possible while you're calling the Secret Phone Number. Here's how it's going to work.

I've been involved with Secret Negotiations with the Defense Minister of Uzbekistan and the Chinese Government as well as several street gangs in Los Angeles. Right now we have a team of Mr. Blackwells preparing to jack the Lunar Landing Module at the Smithsonian Institute. The Chinese have assured me that they will provide a rocket capable of launching the module as far as the orbit of the moon. Unfortunately, they are sick of looking at dollars, in fact they're ready to start burning them to conserve fuel oil, so all the proceeds from the suspicious-looking activities have to be converted to gold bars and shipped to a Secret Destination known only to myself and General Chang who is in charge of shipments to North Korea and me.

The Uzbeki Defense Minister has agreed to provide several of those Russian nuclear suitcase bombs we all heard about after the collapse of the Soviet Union. (Turns out he actually went to school with "Book-em Dan-O" Lasher so he's not that smart and has agreed to accept American currency.) Once the ordnance and the rocket are acquired, the LEM will be mounted on the Chinese rocket at another Secret Destination that can only be deciphered by using a map tattooed onto Dan Mack's ass. (That's why he yanked his pants down two years ago. He had to show me where there was some free space for the tattoo.)

Once the LEM and the rocket are prepared to launch, the suitcase bombs will accompany a specially-trained chimpanzee that outscored "Fairlane" Ford on an IQ test. (Unfortunately for the chimp this will be necessarily be a one-way mission.) At that point, the chimp will set the nuclear devices to destroy the moon, or at least change its course and it's gravitational pull. This will cause a sequence of events that will ultimately result in the tidal action of the earth being dramatically changed such that most of West Los Angeles will disappear under water. According to my calculations, the new beachfront will extend between South Central and the Barrios in East L.A.

This is the payoff you've all been working toward, however you might be asking yourself, "But where are the profits for me, humble journalist?" Well, the Secret Plan also takes into account that you can now buy real estate at the projected beachfront for dirt-cheap, and with luck most of the luxury furniture and vehicles swept in from Bel Air and Beverly Hills will be sitting in your front yard when you move in.

There you have it. Tens of thousands of suspicious-looking poses and proximity calls were not for naught. But don't thank me. I actually got the idea from Ronald Reagan and Austin Powers. (Actually Dr. Evil, but it's the same guy, right? Either way, he's got better writers than the cops.)

And if law enforcement wants to make a joke out of their profession, I'm just the guy to help them do it.

© humble journalist

Is It Something I Said? (Part III)

As I've watched the stooge activity noting the costumes that are obviously integral to the efforts of CLEOs, I often wonder whether my amusement is shared by those with an IQ greater than those that direct the dirtbags, posers, and others who obviously don't have a lot to do besides function as CLEO stooges. It also became obvious a long time ago that there were more dirtbags available to function as CLEO stooges than there were ways to avoid them. The conundrum lies in the fact that these people can approach me any time that serves CLEO purposes and like anyone else, I am obliged to eat, sleep and use a restroom occasionally without the benefit of access to private property. This means that all of the places that are compelling as far as survival become points of attack for CLEO stooges.

Just before I sat down to write this essay, a CLEO Clown in the usual Mr. Blackwell get-up, seemed to be following me after I changed directions and my choice of destinations. An hour later, the same guy showed up several miles away performing the same act despite the fact he was last seen going in the opposite direction thinking that my expected destination would be elsewhere. How did he know I changed course and wound up several miles away? You'll have to ask the cops because they crossed my path several times before the street cams picked me up, and by the time I arrived at the unexpected destination (somewhere other than a library or a crummy fast food establishment where I am obliged to frequent due to financial restrictions), several more CLEO stooges in Mr. Blackwell outfits were already in place, one actually blocking the door so as to affect a proximity pose without my willing participation.

Now the "secret code" aspect of  this has always fascinated me for the simple reason it's so utterly stupid. Only someone stuck on stupid would come up with such a scenario that is necessarily played out in public in front of surveillance cameras, cops who record this stuff, street cams and regularly found in places where I am obliged to visit to survive. These affectations as mentioned previously, have occurred thousands of times, obviously staged, and comical in the sense that the bad actors involved sometimes have to risk their lives to accomplish the proximity poses and to make cell calls in my vicinity. What is the destination of those calls anyway? I've never uttered a word to any of these people except to occasionally tell them to get lost, never handed them a "secret note" or anything else that would be required to convey anything. Yet the affectations continue because any asshole, like the one who just sat down next to me in a Mr. Blackwell get-up, can affect the ridiculous motions that are obviously for the benefit of CLEO directors.

I know this account, and in fact any Internet-based account I've ever used, became controlled by CLEO-friendlies as soon as I logged-in because the servers are controlled by the same parties that have a compelling interest in doing so without fear of prosecution, the same as any other CLEO stooge or proxy. So CLEOs, in their efforts to connect the dots that make it appear that some sort of illegal activity is always going on around me, also control the dots. They direct the dots. They tell the dots what to say. They tell the dots what to wear. They tell the dots where to go and when. They pay the dots. So the 17,520 instances I referred to earlier are predictable in the sense that all CLEOs need is the motive to orchestrate and choreograph these things which they most certainly do, so the Who and Why have always remained a closely-guarded CLEO secret. (The asshole I referred to above properly established proximity in his Mr. Blackwell outfit and has proceeded to affect his performance in front of police surveillance parked in front, so you can make that 17,521 staged portrayals which is a ridiculously conservative number.)

In the absence of contraband or money, I can only assume that the portrayals, along with whatever alleged "credibility" CLEOs enjoy by way of their status, is enough to make all of this crap worthwhile. To them, that is, but unfortunately every time I think the worst of these antics is behind me, another stooge-stampede overshadows the previous world record. (The current record for dirtbag-stalkers converging on an empty restroom until I entered it remains at fourteen). So I am continually asking myself, how does any of this translate into enforcing the law? It doesn't unless you understand that CLEOs have a compelling interest in finding a means of using their authority, their only asset because judicial review has been conspicuously avoided, as a device to cover up professional misconduct described here.

To emphasize the point, we'll add a poll to this essay which will also serve as a Pop Quiz for those who have actually read all of the essays. Who has the most to gain, the most to cover up, or put another way, the most to lose by not finding a way to use prosecutorial authority to cover up the misdeeds described here? The Feds? The State of California? The County of Los Angeles? The County of San Diego? Or the "Field" which includes every other jurisdiction that I may have passed through since reporting theft of my belongings to the Sierra Madre Police Department in May of 2007? Keep in mind that Igor and Whitcraft are both "Feds" as are Kurt Zimmerman and John Vandevelde. All of the military slime are "Feds" as well along with characters like Bill Bogaard, Mayor of Pasadena, and most of the law enforcement personnel who we learned were also ex-military.

Remember also that the County of San Diego has been instrumental, not only in bogus databases entries which I found out later were pretty much routine as far as PMAPS were concerned, but the DA Number Scam which is purely a construct of the CLEO Alternate Universe. (In other words, it makes no f***ing sense and was obviously malicious and deliberative). The County of Los Angeles has also demonstrated a propensity for extra-Constitutional activities, among them most of the examples of illegal access, confiscation, falsifications and collaboration with the primary perpetrators. I also have a suspicion that Steve Cooley is probably less than thrilled with my analysis and commentary.

So here we go! Who will "Pin the Tale" on your humble writer? Of course, we have no way of knowing what the "Tale" might be, but I don't think the PMAPS really give a shit at this point, especially when they know they have tens of thousands of stooges, and almost 30 million Military Thugs and Hags out there to support them in their ongoing attacks on the U.S. Constitution, the First and Fourth Amendments, Equal Protection clause, and the alleged Rule of Law as it pertains to non-CLEOs who are less than enamored with the track record of America's Heroes and their antics (read criminal conduct) here in the Homeland. Eskimo Pie to anyone who can prove they cast the winning vote!

© humble journalist

Civics Lesson: CLEO Bullshit v. The Law

And by the way, I don't have to enter bogus information into law enforcement databases to kidnap people and extort money from them either.

The same principle of CLEO stoogedom applies to all CLEO stooges regardless of the cost or the gratuity involved. The stooge activity that preceded the September 12, 2011 essay was almost unprecedented, hundreds of dirtbags in costumes rushing to affect proximity poses, some pursuing your humble writer down the street, emphasizing the tactical nature of these portrayals. If I had to estimate of the number of staged photo-ops required to propel a CLEO storyline that would include illegal activity on September 12, it would be somewhere between 100-150, most of which were accompanied by cell calls and doesn't take into account the hijacking of these Internet-based essays by he Guardians of Literacy and Free Speech.

This allows for another calculation that will help to define CLEO strategems. It has been almost exactly four years since the first paragraphs on CLEO antics, fabrications, falsifications, thefts, et al, were written. If we take a conservative number like a dozen staged portrayals with super-covert surveillance photo-ops to support them, that means that law enforcement has collected 17,520 phony portrayals that serve their purposes of implying illegal activity. (My estimation, being the primary witness of these things, would be closer to 50,000). Despite all of this activity that includes conpicuous boomerang retrievals, staged arrests, Abandoned Shopping Bags, at no point has any law enforcement official searched my belongings or made an arrest based on the activity of CLEO stooges. But the recitals, photo-ops, affectations, stage props, costumes and proximity poses have been constants. The reason is simple. At no time was I ever in possession of contraband or money that would naturally be expected to accompany any of this CLEO bullshit.

Instead, CLEOs have used stooges as their primary vehicles to imply illegal activity. As I've watched these antics, the appearance of CLEO stooges over great distances and their arrival at a specific location unknown to anyone besides myself, the intent has always been obvious as well as the direction required to make it happen. No one besides law enforcement (or military slime stalkers that perform that task for them when necessary) could possibly anticipate or have knowledge of my location at a particular time. But question is not so much how these things are staged or why. My question has always been who are they and what do they get from law enforcement in exchange for these performances? So along the way I've noted that there have been two generalities that appear to be valid categorical references.

First, we have seen the lower forms of dirtbags that will affect portrayals, harass, provoke, commit thefts or assaults for petty cash which appears to be paid out by military slime that directs these things for the benefit of law enforcement (who are obviously anticipating the result since they are always nearby when they occur). The second category are those who already have pending issues with law enforcement, some released from jail for the purpose of becoming CLEO stooges. When, for instance, Carl Killian became the only person that could establish my location on July 14, 1994, he had a pending DUI case, though I'm fairly certain the record of it has been expunged for obvious reasons. When Scott Butler introduced Michael E. Bartley to this fiasco, he also had a pending DUI, (his second or third if memory serves), as well as serious issues with the IRS that resulted in his real estate license being temporarily revoked.

The King of the Stooges serves as another example. He performs a task for the Big Shots in Monrovia that he described as "taking the trash out to the curb" which is a metaphorical way of describing how many city leaders deal with most of what they consider riff-raff or undesirables in modern urban environments. There are many ways to accomplish this of course, and one of them is to implicate, make false statements for the benefit of CLEO reports, affect portrayals, steal property, plant "evidence" or any number of CLEO tactics described earlier in these essays. City leaders, particularly those who have a compelling interest in covering up their participation in the criminal activities described here, then share the same motives as those with common affiliations like military slime, PMAPS, County Hags or law enforcement personnel.

(Unfortunately, at this point we saw another "Conflicting Edits" prompt when I tried to save the text above meaning that hijacking the account while I'm logged-in, indicative of the IP Scam, also remains a constant as an element of any CLEO storyline. This is always accompanied by stooge activity in the vicinity, dirtbags with plastic bags or other stage props entering and exiting, so false attribution of communications continues to be a requisite for CLEOs to portray illegal activity, as well as the aforementioned stooges.) 

In this way, those with shared motives and affiliations assist each other, either provide immunity from illegal activities like ID fraud by DMV personnel, frauds that involve theft or misappropriation of property by way of falsifications to official databases, records and documents, etc., or use law enforcement as a matter of expediency to contain or cover up misconduct. Those with shared motives and affiliations can shield themselves from culpability or liability by using the authority and status inherent to those positions. PMAPS then, not only provide a weapon and a shield for themselves, but also for their benefactors who share those same motives and affiliations, especially political, as I have duly noted here.

CLEO stooges then, are the only requisite for the portrayals, recitals, statements, photo-ops, proximity poser text messages, and other affectations that are clearly intended to suggest illegal activity, and these people are relatively cheap for a number of reasons. First, when gratuities are exchanged with CLEO stooges, there is no cost to their benefactors; they are paid either in public funds or favors that are inherent to the authority bestowed upon them by the taxpayers. Second, when stooges provide bogus complaints, false statements, or affect phony portrayals, they don't have to concern themselves with the fact that these activities along with their collusion with law enforcement, are illegal because PMAPS have a self-serving interest in making sure that they are never prosecuted.

(They also had a self-serving interest in making sure that none of the alleged "arrests" described in Lasher's narrative were ever prosecuted either. To do so would have exposed the scam forthwith because your humble writer was never arrested on any of those occasions. Prior to Bartley's demise in December 1999, while those IDs were still in my possession, that could have easily been demonstrated to the court as easily as it was at the identity hearing when the PMAPS offered no rebuttal to the conclusion reached by the court, nor did they dispute any of the evidence rendered to the court. Any confusion on the subject, is therefore strictly on the part of PMAPS like Paul "Pffft" who have not offered any sort of explanation for the DA Number Scam.)

So the thousands of CLEO stooges that have propelled the various CLEO storylines, many of which I can only guess at because I have never been questioned about any specific investigation or the basis of it, are easy to find and don't show up on any ledger, which explains the vast numbers that CLEOs have used to affect the portrayals and provide the impetus for the Perpetual Investigation, (the latest "investigation" the result of the complaint against LASD Deputy Goon and the Raid, Rummage and Ransack tactics routinely used by various law enforcement officials to circumvent the Fourth Amendment as it pertains to search and seizure.)

This is a brief synopsis courtesy of Find Law:

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects personal privacy, and every citizen's right to be free from unreasonable government intrusion into their persons, homes, businesses, and property -- whether through police stops of citizens on the street, arrests, or searches of homes and businesses.

Lawmakers and the courts have put in place legal safeguards to ensure that law enforcement officers interfere with individuals' Fourth Amendment rights only under limited circumstances, and through specific methods.


In the criminal law realm, Fourth Amendment "search and seizure" protections extend to:

• A law enforcement officer's physical apprehension or "seizure" of a person, by way of a stop or arrest; and
• Police searches of places and items in which an individual has a legitimate expectation of privacy -- his or her person, clothing, purse, luggage, vehicle, house, apartment, hotel room, and place of business, to name a few examples.

The Fourth Amendment provides safeguards to individuals during searches and detentions, and prevents unlawfully seized items from being used as evidence in criminal cases. The degree of protection available in a particular case depends on the nature of the detention or arrest, the characteristics of the place searched, and the circumstances under which the search takes place.

When Does the Fourth Amendment Apply?

The legal standards derived from the Fourth Amendment provide constitutional protection to individuals in the following situations, among others:

• An individual is stopped for police questioning while walking down the street.
• An individual is pulled over for a minor traffic infraction, and the police officer searches the vehicle's trunk.
• An individual is arrested.
• Police officers enter an individual's house to place him or her under arrest.
• Police officers enter an individual's apartment to search for evidence of crime.
• Police officers enter a corporation's place of business to search for evidence of crime.
• Police officers confiscate an individual's vehicle or personal property and place it under police control.

Simply put, since John Andrew Whitcraft, Jr. and Kevin M. Cimarusti dispossessed my mother by way of the fraudulent General Power of Attorney document, all of my property has been stolen, confiscated, searched and seized on many occasions. In no instance did a court order ever accompany it, and in fact on many occasion my property was returned to me in a corrupted form, minus documentation or storage media, or I found counterfeit documents switched with those that were seized. At no time was I ever advised of any legitimate basis for any investigation, and in most instances wasn't even accused of a crime. When I was, the charges were dropped. The remainder of the seizures were actually nothing more than thefts that law enforcement steadfastly refused to acknowledge perpetrated by those named above.

And all of this, as well as the CLEO Comedy Act that includes CLEO Clowns and Stooges described here, under the auspices of enforcing the law.

© humble journalist

CLEO Duh?

Note that the e-mail from da.lacounty.gov in response to the complaint features another phone number with instructions to call that number, so let us review. If the call is not redirected to a dead voice mail box, or if I am not put on hold 'till forever, the call will likely by taken by either a Military Hag or another stand-in who will disseminate bogus information, typical of CLEOs and their ilk. Even if the call were actually fielded by a representative of that office, there would be no record of it as I do not have a personal communication device and would therefore, be using a public phone. I also don't have a call-back number which would, I'm sure, cause another obstacle to whatever process the e-mail is implying. In other words, it would be like asking for LASD to say, "Gee, we never received the call (or the report)" which is one of the points I that was clarified long ago.

The point is that the e-mail itself is a rather succinct description of the complaint, is it not? So this tends to support another theory that has been building momentum since "Book-em Dan-O" Lasher's narrative provided evidence of the English skills level of the average cop. In that instance, we saw a grim reminder of how many students are unable to proceed to the next level of their education because of this handicap. "Assholette" Davis also lent support to this theory when she appeared to be unable to read the numerous corrections that were required to correct her self-serving falsifications. And now we see another law enforceement officials choosing to avoid the clear and concise nature of the complaint in its written form. It also suggests that some members of the law enforcement community have not read these essays which describe these things in detail as well.

This is the f***ing report if the certified correspondence, phone calls and e-mails aren't acknowledged. That's why these essays were posted in the first place. Jeez.

(Pardon the interruption, but the Guardians of Literacy and Free Speech interrupted service again, as in hijacked the account. The IP Scam is fundamental to CLEO tactics, along with the dirtbags who swarm in for photo-op support. Truly something to behold).

The points I was going to make anyway are actually supported by these observations regarding literacy in the CLEO community. I couldn't help but notice the three headliner crime stories in Mr. Roger's neigborhood all involved law enforcement personnel. High level people, not street cops or nose-picking half-wit security guards. We found one of Mr. Roger's deputies trying to buy crack from his vehicle. We saw a deputy U.S. Attorney involved in a scam to bilk homeowner's asscociations, her accomplice being her boyfriend who just happened to be a cop. The story got even uglier from that point. We saw the son of the Law and Order Judge hold up a casino in the most dramatic heist since Bugsy owned a third-rate clip joint Downton, using a gun he got from dear ol' dad's cache of weapons.

I can almost hear the readers asking, "Why aren't there any traditional criminal types involved in all of these headliner crimes, humble journalist? Wouldn't  you think that at least one would involve someone who wasn't a career law enforcement professional?" Good question, but the answer will not be forthcoming here. Only accurate accounts of my own experiences along with observations and accounts of CLEO antics.

But it provides us with another opportunity to make a point out of seemingly disparate occurrences. On my last visit to a public restroom, I encountered four guys standing around talking, as opposed to using the facilities for their intended purpose. As usual, in thirty seconds or less I managed to accomplish my task and exit, but I overhead the one who appeared most likely to be the military slime whispering instructions to the dirtbags with him. Guess what? They were going to make a bogus complaint regarding your humble writer, and as near as I can tell the military slimeball was using twenty dollar bills to persuade them to participate.

I've noted on several occasions that dirtbags are routinely compensated for their services, and on many more occasions there has been circumstantial evidence to support this conclusion. Twenty bucks seems to be the ammount that most dirtags will accept to follow someone into a restroom, perform boomerang-related tasks, make a bogus complaint, pose for photo-ops, or recite a script provided them by CLEOs for obvious reasons. I have also pointed out that the "credibility" issue is unnecessary to discuss further because there are several ways to deal with falsified reports or bogus complaints, my favorite being "You Bet Your Life" Polygraph Palooza.

But as a journalist it isn't important whethere someone is dumb enough to believe Lasher's narrative or the CLEO stooges required to support it. It is my task to be truthful and accurate. Let others run around plugging the holes in their story. Mine is static and doesn't require recruiting dirtbags, stooges, lifting DMV photos or stealing IDs. It doesn't require stealing or destroying property and documents that would constitute evidence of a crime or eliminating witnesses. It doesn't require a thousand bogus complaints to be paid for in a lame attempt to cover up a single falsified report made more than  decade earlier.

Let's make a calculation here to make a point. If CLEOs pay dirtbags twenty bucks and accrue a thousand bogus complaints, what have they accomplished? For twenty grand they have made a heroic attempt to protect and defend Dan Lasher. But what they actually purchased was twenty grand worth of dirtbag credibility, which is to say more CLEO bullshit that can be shoveled onto Mt. CLEO as it continues to grow. Of course, this is easier and probably cheaper that donating a kidney, but at the same time, "dirtbag credibility" is one of the comical aspects of all this and it allows me to make another point.

When Whitcraft's parrot weighed in with his commentary, he implied that to support Whitcraft, the alleged credibility of a cop would suffice, (which caused a roar of laughter at this post. We'll forget about the lawyers for the time being because they are, after all, paid to say whatever). So Whitcraft and Igor are looking for support from cops like CLEO Award-winner "Fairlane" Ford who also happens to be the King of the WAGs and was actually complicit in the crimes described here. ("Anything you say, Mr. Whitcraft. Need some help with those suppositories Mr. Whitcraft? I can change my name to 'Chevy' if you'd like that better Mr. Whitcraft"). Is this some kind of CLEO humor?

Probably not, because as we descend into the CLEO gutter and the Igor/Whitcraft cesspool, the "credibility" issue actually gets murkier and murkier, not clearer. In other words, we have arrived at a point where Igor and Whitcraft are relying on crooked cops, accomplices actually, to support their alleged credibility, and the cops who falsify the reports, ("Book-em Dan-O" Lasher comes to mind) are relying on some drunks they picked up off the street to make bogus complaints to support their impeccable credibility. (You have to see the dirtbags scratching their heads getting their instructions when they're actually trying to figure out how much malt liquor they can buy with twenty bucks. Only military slime could organize, and pay for, this stuff.)

So one lie begets another, and CLEO bullshit begets even more CLEO bullshit to be plausible, resulting in a ridiculous sequence of contrivances, fabrications, falsifications. Meanwhile, the alleged "credibility" of those involved, continues to deteriorate, spiralling downward into the cesspool where the primary perpetrators maintian possession of stolen property. So why, do you ask, are all the perps in the headliner crimes described above top-level law enforcement personnel? I'll keep at it until it becomes clear. Hopefully.

© humble journalist

Return Of Essay 29

Report of Misconduct

Federal Bureau of Investigation; Andre Birotte, U.S. Attorney for CACD; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General for the State of California; Steven Cooley, District Attorney, County of Los Angeles.


I herewith allege the following:


That on or about June 8, 2010 and again on June 11, 2010 and on several occasions since, State of California employees committed theft of court documents and exhibits to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California at the at the California Employment Development Department offices (EDD) in Pasadena.


That on or about June 28, 2010, State of California employees redirected phone service to an official agency, misdirected a fax report required to for the business of the U.S. District Court, an official report of misconduct against their office and personnel, and illegally accessed account information and documents, with the deliberative intent of interfering with litigation against the State of California, the City of Pasadena and sub-agencies and others named as defendants, in violation of the Rules and Procedures of the U.S. District Court and the U.S. Code.


That on or about July 6, 2010 and again on July 8, 2010, State of California employees did maliciously attack and corrupt storage media, illegally accessed personal accounts, corrupted and/or disabled those account with malicious intent, and committed theft of property; specifically original document “Addendum to Complaint” and printed copy of  “13. Ceast and Desist” exhibit to the U.S. District Court, with malicious intent and in violation of provisions of the U.S. Code specified below.


That on or about July 25, 2010 State of California employees directed proxies to handle court documents, exhibits and other articles and materials for the purpose of intimidation and harassment, and possibly the theft of those items, as well as to prevent access to the public facilities necessary for access to the courts and the business, rules and procedures of those courts.


That these acts constitute violations of §§ Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245.


Dated: July 29, 2010

This essay somehow disappeared, then reappeared after it was posted on the date above. As far as I know, there was no malicious code because nothing was pasted into it, but by that time my flash-drive I used to store documents had been corrupted (and remains that way). When Essay 30 became a "Duplicate" it was for the simple reason that the rather sophisticated parties that can accomplish that feat also have the capacity to hack the account, and replaced the original Essay 30 with the "Duplicate" which was referred to earlier. They had to. Because had that document not been replaced the code that was used to corrupt my flash drive would have been posted on the Internet, easily decipherable to anyone with the expertise to analyze the code.

While I understand the tactics, the techniques and especially the motives and the parties that are obviously hostile to my journalistic endeavors, it remains a mystery as to what can be done to stop them. I've noted the constant, incessant attacks on this account for instance, but on the occasions I have attempted to deal with these things with the reporting mechanisms available, there has been no legitimate reply. "Hey, Google, my e-mail account is so corrupted no one gets my e-mails, and if I ever get a reply it is a year or more later after I post the original e-mail on the Internet. What to do?" And guess what? I've never gotten a reply from Google either, which isn't to say they ever received it, because the account is only usable to the extent that the servers and the IT Techs and the 14 or so points where packets are exchanged allow for it. You don't complain about your handset phone when you know the lines are down. It ain't the phone.

But the essays as I've emphasized before, were intended to compensate for the lack of response by law enforcement officials with jurisdiction to legitimate reports of criminality. Since it became obvious that those reports also referred to crimes in progress, I thought it was worthwhile to do everything I could to communicate the information using whatever means possible. I knew those who had put so much effort into avoiding acknowledgment of the reports might see it as antagonistic on my part, but there has never been any malice intended in my lawful and rather routine efforts to make official reports to those with jurisdiction.

On the contrary, I knew that when that much in the way of personal belongings ends up in the hands of people who will do anything to cover up their criminality, I was in serious jeopardy. And it wasn't long before I realized that my assessment was correct. That property began to show up in places that were clearly intended to incriminate me in crimes I had nothing to do with. It was clearly transported for that purpose. It was passed around by law enforcement officials in different jurisdictions, and I've never had any means of recovering it or even making a report of it.

To me, that is all screwed up, especially when one considers that potential consequences for your humble writer as I watched my remaining possessions disappear or become similar vehicles for corruption or misplacement by the officials that confiscated, (or simply stole) them using color of authority. So it got to the point where I basically said "Who the f*** do these people think they are anyway?" The answer, of course, was obvious. They are the people who can steal your mail, redirect your phone calls and make sure you never send or receive an e-mail. They are the people who can access your blog anytime they want and make any sort of alterations or deletions that suits their purposes. They are the people who can make database entries to produce a printout that shows that you have a longer record than Al Capone. That's who they are, and collectively the PMAPS have a shitload of power and authority.

So what to do? Well, without the funds to do much of anything besides describe my experience, that has been the only thing possible. And until someone in the law enforcement community acknowledges these report, as well as the other things I have not mentioned here, then I'm more or less obligated to point out how these things have directly effected me. (And that that doesn't even count the Access and Corruption that I am aware of that occurred when law enforcement gained possession of my remaining possessions). But hey, we're all adults here and journalism is what it is. Bullshit is what it is. And malicious code does what it does. So I will continue to address these issues to the best of ability for the benefit of the judiciary, the general population and for my own amusement.

© humble journalist

Stooge Attack

So as I sit to write another essay, we see all the usual suspects congregating to perform the CLEO IP Scam, (log-in at 12:23 on September 1, 2011), with the expectation that some sort of CLEO-friendly communication or printout will be the result. Remember that these people are very clever. So clever in fact, that over the last twenty years, with access provided by Kevin M. Cimarusti and John Andrew Whitcraft, Jr., they have had more control over my property than I have. And since Whitcraft recorded his fraudulent General Power of Attorney document, enforced by nose-picking half-wits like "Fairlane" Ford, the rest of my property was either stolen or corrupted and returned by law enforcement.

So on many occasions I've asked, "Why can't law enforcement find a way to enforce the law without accessing my property first?" which also applies to Internet-based accounts like this one. Because it hasn't escaped my notice that since May 2007 when I made that two-page theft report, law enforcement personnel have constantly found ways to take possession of my property, then hand it back to me, either minus important documents, or in a corrupted state, and in no instance have anything resembling legitimate charges ever resulted.

But that may be changing, as we have seen Mt. CLEO grow to enormous proportions, one dirt clod at a time supplied by those law enforcement officials with the most culpability or liability, those jurisdictions and some of their antics described in these essays. And of course, it has become rather obvious that bogus complaints and falsified reports are the dirt clods, America's Heroes handing themselves "evidence" that has become Mt. CLEO. Meanwhile, knowing the Who and the Why that law enforcement has conspicuously subtracted from the equations, I have endeavored to stay focus on the subjects that are not susceptible to prevarication, corruption or theft; those issues that I consider to be significant for a number of reasons beyond their usefulness as vehicles for CLEO aggression.

Since we've discussed hijacked communications to the extent possible due to lack of cooperation by those who have (yawn) stolen, blocked, redirected or corrupted mail, phone and e-mails, along with accurate records of them, we are left with the few existing communications, usually e-mails which are indicators of CLEO activities and aggression as all communications and stooge attacks are, keeping in mind that there is always a CLEO scam in progress regardless of where I am or what I happen to be doing. Anything I could possibly do has either been criminalized or become part of an investigation by The Good Guys who are committed to protecting America from destitute journalists. Here is our latest example, the date and address images instead of text. This is an important point, because it is images that have routinely been switched within accounts, and also have the most potential for malicious code to become part of, let's say, a blog like this one.

When an image is used in any Internet-based environment, it becomes a vehicle for hackers, and when I started writing on the subject the first pages are devoted to e-mails received from the Sierra Madre Police Department no less, that used images instead of text and Rich Text with the same capability that I found out later had corrupted my computer and all of my storage media before I realized it what had occurred. (This is why the only image you will find here is that of George W. Bush, but Microsoft is still struggling with Rich Text problems that hackers have been exploiting for years. See Microsoft "Problems" catalog.)

Here is the most recent e-mail which is probably a direct result of the essays that discuss the incident, but also an opportunity for L.A. County to "investigate" their own CLEO stooges, or to turn it into another falsified report which, no doubt, will determine that I was the perpetrator. But if nothing else, it will also determine the identity of the cowardly, worm-like wanna-be cop which would be interesting to find out. If so, it will be reported here. 

Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:12 PM
jgarriso@da.lacounty.gov The law requires that the agency involved to make an internal affairs investigation regarding citizen's complaints. If probable cause exists to believe a law enforcement officer has committed a crime they will forward the case to our office. Since you case involves LASD Deputies you should contact their complaint line at (800) 698-8255

So I've converted the images to text here, because I had to delete the entire "Somebody Is Lying" essay that included e-mails because even after I tried to delete just the images, they remained embedded in the document. These embedded images that can also be part of a maliciously constructed website, burrow into the document and provide "placeholders" for images to be inserted through an Internet connection any time hackers choose. And of course, they can also insert any sort of image they would like once the embedded "placeholder" becomes part of the document. This problem is exacerbated by programs that actively scan the Internet for images, which is likely what happened to Michael Fiola and perhaps thousands of others who didn't know their computer had become an Incrimination Machine due to malicious code they had inadvertently picked up browsing the Internet, pasting text that contained malicious code into a document that was stored on their computer or storage media, or opening an e-mail.

These devices are well-know to hackers, as are the many ways to acquire someone's passwords or other personal information. This is no big secret as we have seen that hundreds of millions of accounts have been invaded, the data stolen or destroyed, since "Questioning the Internet" was posted. (The link to the Associated Press article on Michael Fiola was broken, so here is an article at Huffington Post that refers to that piece. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/09/internet-virus-frames-use_n_350426.html )

What has amazed me since I started watching how this story developed, knowing that my storage media had filled itself with several GB's of hidden files as described in "Somebody Is Lying" below, was that prosecutors acted as if they were totally oblivious to the fact that trojans, viruses and malicious code existed. Of course, the PMAPS have no interest in becoming educated, only accusing people. But when I started writing on this subject in August 2007 it was because I already knew my computer and storage media had been corrupted, and after doing some research, it wasn't difficult to figure out those two crucial W's, the Who and Why.

To some extent the corruption was through direct access, physical possession of my belongings. On other occasions through an Internet connection, but once copies had been made of all my files, including those saved from prior to when the corruption occurred, the originals were clearly targeted by law enforcement and military slime like the crooked, alleged "pastor" Dave Mack of Monrovia, Ca. After that storage media went missing after law enforcement or military slime had gained possession or was destroyed by people who somehow knew the originals existed, much like the IDs, employment records, dated photos, memorabilia, postmarked correspondence and other articles were targeted.

So there came a time when, after multiple Access and Corruption incidents, mostly staged or contrived by law enforcement, I was only left with those things that law enforcement wanted to Recover to complete the ACR formula. Now I've never made a secret of any of this, and in fact have made repeated attempt to report these things as well, partly for my own protection since I have known since they occurred that the How and Why were critical to the ACR equation. And also knowing that the access points where I was separated from my possessions were clearly orchestrated for that purpose, just like Raid, Rummage and Ransack attacks have been.

At this point, hoping to preserve text in its original form, I will move to the next posting (which of course caused the text frame to lock up when I tried to save it. Apparently the IT Tech won't be caught off guard again. The time is 1:35 p.m. on September 1, 2011). But before I post it, I am saving the text to the clipboard, so when the alterations and deletions that have occurred when the "draft saved" version replaces this one, I will be able to copy the original text to another document. So f*** you IT Techs, Public Servants who control the servers I'm obliged to use, and those who have used illegal access to perform that trick repeatedly in the past.

And one more notation: When I tried to sign out of the account, the sign out was redirected. So did I actually sign out? Can I sign out? Or is that how the IT Tech will maintain control once I leave? More fascinating Internet-base questions to come, but the Who and Why remain constant, because I'm not the guy hacking my own essays to pieces or has a motive to leave his account open, or to allow asshole IT Techs to share my blog space while I'm writing. 1:50 p.m. Sept. 1, 2011.

© humble journalist

"Red Meat (I will use that term as a matter of convenience and brevity to designate any information that is conspicuously concealed, hidden or destroyed)." Note that this reference was deleted after seeing CLEO stooges buzzing your humble writer with red hats. (I'm not kidding). If this is supposed to be CLEOs idea of a "secret code" scenario, knowing that CLEOs have a propensity for this sort of thing to justify their super-covert, law enforcement professional surveillance capabilities and the Perpetual Investigation, I will remind them that this issue was dealt with more than a year ago. There is only one acceptable "secret code" that will be recognized here. Bouffant hairdos. And besides, a reference to red meat doesn't include anything red; it would be too confusing, because like Mr. Blackwell outfits, there's too many of them. So until I see someone with a T-bone steak tied to their head, I will try and ignore the antics of CLEO stooges. Are you getting all this Judge Miller? Because what is, and has been required since I started writing on these subjects, is adult supervision, something that has been conspicuously lacking by all parties involved.

Link to excerpts: http://humbleexcerpts.blogspot.com

The CLEO Comedy: Part II

Note the hacking of this piece below, which occurred above the tenth paragraph. The passages above were deleted, the sentence obviously indicative of the separation point. I will attempt to reconstruct in a simplified manner, that which was altered and deleted for rather obvious reasons. (I was discussing the subject of illegal access, the Who and the Why, so the deletions are, once again, rather self-explanatory as far as motive). But it raises the question that has prevailed throughout. Why would anyone think it was necessary to attack the account and delete even a single word? Who has a motive to do so? And why is this a continuing problem, something that is clearly illegal, malicious and destructive? When the perpetrators of these attacks remove passages, alter text or engage in falsification to those things attributable to me, they provide the Why which is usually a fairly good indicator of Who. Why for instance, was a "Bobblehead" character necessary in the first place, another CLEO stooge a requisite to perform the ridiculous affectations and proximity posing necessary to conjure up another falsehood? 

These are the indications of the holes in the CLEO dike, the things that require proactive measures including obfuscation, falsification or other contrivances to support their agenda. But what we see below is another example of a criminal act perpetrated against your humble writer. Breaking and entering. Theft. Illegal access to an account, the ingress provided by Public Servants who have never feared consequences, let alone prosecution, for any of the crimes they have committed against me or my mother. The reconstructed sentences are highlighted in yellow.  

I should have mentioned in the previous essay that FBI was supplied with a cover letter that included a link address for the first 29 essays, the response to the lack of interest by those with jurisdiction. But the civil rights violations that pervade the story are significant as well, at least to me. This is one of the many annoyances, for lack of a better word, that I have been obliged to deal with since the law enforcement community realized that it was likely I would figure out the sequence of events described here.

You see, law enforcement has always known that I am not an uneducated, ex-military drug-addict and they also knew there were some serious liability issues associated with the misconduct described here. So when the first Raid, Rummage and Ransack attack occurred on May 4, 2007 it was a harbinger for things to come. In simple terms, they hit the panic button when the benefits of lying far outweighed the consequences of telling the truth.

This caused a predictable series of events that I refer to as CLEO aggression which continue to this day. It has been my opinion all along that it was the California DMV and a few law enforcement officials in San Diego that were the most culpable, but as it became apparent that others were involved as well, my property disappeared, the cops became stalkers in a desperate attempt to either destroy or acquire photos, and I found that anyone who approached me was either affiliated with the military, law enforcement or both, because the agenda from that point forward was completely dependent on theft of property and complaints; a two track effort to contain knowledge of the scam from becoming known to anyone outside the military-law enforcement communities; those who obviously knew that a crime was still in progress. In fact, it was that desperation (and Chris Zimmerman's comment) that led me to believe that "some blonde guy" was indeed running around with a fraudulent ID.

It also led me to believe that the June 4, 1997 court orders had indeed been violated, as if they had been invalidated by the thefts that had occurred since. That others had picked up where Michael E. Bartley had left off when he pled guilty to perjury, ending the CLEO charade, but not the retroactive assignment of his criminal record to your humble writer by way of the DA Number Scam. But since I understand the reasoning behind the CLEO aggression, the stooge activity, the hacking of accounts, the fabrication of "evidence" and the many devices used for false attribution common to CLEOs, I decided to take a practical approach by doing my best to describe these things.

The Perpetual Investigation continues, Mt. CLEO has grown to enormous proportions, CLEO aggression has reached a ridiculous point that requires a cast of thousands, harassment by military slime and CLEO proxies has reached new record levels as well, and the volume of complaints and falsified reports, the basis for all things CLEO, seems to be commensurate with my efforts to accurately describe in detail what was once a simple, two-page theft report.

But there have also been sources of amusement, because the notion of a simple theft report turning into such a big deal has its moments. The clownish behavior of CLEO stooges for example really has to be witnessed to be believed. One has to see people rushing towards you or following you into a restroom to make a cell call, or chasing you down the street in high-heels, or bolting through traffic to establish proximity for a photo-op to actually believe it. Or the way CLEO stooges just happen to appear whenever and wherever I happen to be, even if it is only for a few moments. Do all these people sit around waiting for the cops to call them with instructions? Yeah, as a matter of fact, they do. Because on several occasions I've seen CLEO stooges rushing to get to a point that is a likely destination, often breaking the law, or putting themselves or their kids in danger to do it.

cking cell phone that they can use somewhere besides where I'm sitting? Am I supposed to be an antenna for you assholes?

Another source of annoyance is the fact that I am obliged to throttle my humble attitude. Take, for instance, the morning of this post, August 31, 2011 where you will see that this account was demonstrably hacked as it has been since the first post. Though I can't prove it because the evidence and the hardware is controlled by the Guardians of Literacy and Free Speech, it is likely that another IT Tech has illegally invaded, or provided access to, the small amount of property that I call my own. Now when Ms. Honey first saw me, she couldn't help smirking as if to say, "Don't worry Public Servants, I can roll this guy under the technology bus and he'll never know what hit him." But of course, during my last encounter, she looked visibly upset, barely containing her anger and angst after the post that pointed out that she had not only committed several crimes, but had also left the evidence of it all over the place. (Or she may have been suffering from the worst case of PMS I've ever seen).

But on this occasion I signed out quickly and unexpectedly, causing the display shown in that essay. The Hubpages account does not display that information, so as I watched deletions to text, it could only be described, those descriptions often deleted as well. This proves that unauthorized access occurs after I log-in, something that could only be known to the people present, and also a requisite for CLEO stooges who have perpetrated the variations of the IP Scam for the purpose of falsely attributing printed materials to your humble writer. The illegal access to the account and the subsequent alterations and deletions, must be perpetrated by those with knowledge of my log-in and control of the systems and servers. 

That narrows the field of suspects to those who also happen to have a motive. In this instance, the access is clearly the result of the IT Tech simply sitting in her office watching my log-ins and log-outs, but she didn't expect me to sign out so quickly and was unprepared to do likewise at that moment, so the display proves, once and for all that the alterations and deletions occur from within the facility because the "LogMeIn" program was disabled prior to log-in to the account. That makes her a criminal, possibly a "Bobblehead" candidate as well who might fabricate a story about how she was "helping" me to write these essays. She doesn't have much of a choice at this point, because there is no longer any doubt that the account was attacked, that passages were removed and that there could only be one reason for those deletions, none of them consistent with my interests, all of them consistent with CLEO interests and contrivances witnessed, documented and described over a period of years.

CLEOs from the account as I've always suspected, and that the text deletions that have plagued my accounts were only possible because of illegal access provided by the Public Servants that control them. (The IP Scam, the false attribution of printouts from the same IP was easy to figure knowing what I do about CLEO false attribution tactics, but doing it from inside the account was only known to me because I watched the alterations and deletions as I wrestled for control with the IT Techs who always won because the could lock me out for long enough to do it, or blocking the Internet connection while they did).

So another IT Tech was walked into a trap set by your humble writer, but the most annoying aspect is that I am obliged to be civil with these people, Public Servants, nose-picking half-wits, and even IT Techs who prove to be criminals, otherwise someone will make a complaint about my attitude and the cops will show up. And it is much the same with CLEO stooges, military slime and cowardly, worm-like, wanna-be cops who are nothing more than stalkers looking for an opportunity to provoke, incite or harass your humble writer.

The other annoyance I will end this essay with, due to time restrictions, are the cops who are always investigating something, allegedly, but have never come right out and asked me anything resembling a simple question. I've never tried to conceal either my identity, my location, or anything else. So what's with all the super-covert, law enforcement professional surveillance crap anyway? Every time I make a report the cops are hiding under their desks, but the rest of the time they're out there acting like the guys in all the bad cop dramas that went off the air a long time ago. In the twenty years that are described in these essays, I've never had an opportunity to litigate or participate in the adjudication of anything described in a police report, any charges that resulted from a complaint, and means of defending myself against slander. So what's up with that?

You want something to investigate? Try explaining why every document I can find, all the court records, and even Lasher's comical attempt at creative dialog describe Michael E. Bartley as having blue eyes. I do not. My eyes are dark brown, very dark brown, and always have been. So before I waste any more time pointing out the ridiculous discrepancies in the CLEO Alternate Universe where falsified reports and bogus database entries prevail, how about someone tackling that single issue, and in the meantime I'll be engaged in analyzing and describing the subjects that are more interesting and significant that the stupidity found in police reports.  

Are you getting all this Judge Miller? I hope so.

© humble journalist 

Somebody Is Lying

I could spend a lot of time and space describing hijacked mail services, but suffice it to say that beyond the accounts already published I have more than a hundred certified mail receipts with varying results. On some occasions the USPS freely admitted the mail was not delivered. "We regret to inform you . . . " or acknowledgement of non-delivery either in person or the USPS website. The fact that on several occasions USPS supervisors refused to supply their records of delivery was not unexpected, just more Red Meat that pertains to the activities of some of our Public Servants. The certified mail receipts I'm referring to remain in my possession, but the addressees have never confirmed delivery themselves, and in fact usually claim that the correspondence wasn't received.

This leaves us with a choice between say, Marilyn Diaz and Steve Cooley, who have disavowed knowledge of reports and correspondence for the reasons described here, or the Public Servants who allegedly brave rain, sleet and snow to deliver those official communications. Somebody is lying. This has been the only conclusion I've been able to reach in any discussions with either party on this subject. So we'll have to leave it at that for the moment.

Phone services are more interesting, but also more difficult to document or prove. Back in the day, when I thought phone calls would result in speaking to the person that I intended to call, I was often given bogus information or none at all. I could call the same person a hundred times and get their voice mail, for instance. When I didn't have a personal communication device, I would be put on hold, sometimes indefinitely while my supply of change disappeared. After forty minutes or so, without the funds to remain on hold, the effort would be terminated for practical reasons. Once the bogus phone records were displayed on the counterfeit website in April of 2008, I saw no reason to waste money on phone service when the byproduct was nothing more than CLEO contrivances that were obviously variations of false attribution.

(Of course, since then, CLEO Stooges have become a nuisance, making desperate attempts to establish proximity while conspicuously using their personal communication devices. Another aspect of CLEO Logic that makes no sense to me. The people I have seen that try to establish proximity are not the sort of people I would trust for any reason, especially communicating on my behalf. But CLEO storylines are only known to CLEOs and their stooges, so I have reasoned that the destination of those calls is the key to CLEO bullshit. Whatever. It is not something I have any control over anyway, so it will have to remain a mystery for the moment, two more missing W's). 

So this leaves us with those things I say, or have said, in public or outdoors where CLEOs can record them, and e-mails. Now there have been a number of occasions when my spoken words were recorded, and I mentioned an incident early on to illustrate the point, the "Go f*** a porcupine" example, which may or may not end up on someone's voice mail. But most of the time CLEO stooges try to lead me into saying something that serves CLEO purposes. Without going into all the occurrences over the years, by far the most common is asking how much something costs or what did I pay for something.

The intent is rather obvious. If I answer the question, I have provided a recording that can be used by CLEOs in any number of voice-over scenarios. Cops have done this sort of things on many occasions, during stop, search and question occurrences which are fairly constant. "Where are you from? Where are you going? Where were you born? Have you ever been arrested?" and so on, which in many cases may provides a recording that can be used in a manner consistent with CLEO storylines because there is no time/date stamp associated with anything I've ever said. Taken out of context, these recordings can be used in a variety of ways, perhaps even used as supplements or proof of proximity when script-readers goes into a recital which is transcribed later.

They are also useful when CLEOs execute the Abandoned Shopping Bag scam, because all they really want to do is establish identity and location just before they go back into the bushes and retrieve the ASB they put there a few minutes before. But for the most part, connecting me to CLEO Stooges is the primary goal, and this only requires proximity, so it is rare to find anything resembling solitude for even a few moments because CLEO scams are always in progress, and they must be supported not only by the stooges, but establishment of identity and location either by vocalizations, surveillance cameras, or the drive-by's by cops that accompany stooge activity.

The fact that CLEOs have relied on my exposure to these tactics, has always been of paramount importance, so it isn't surprising that I have never been offered private accommodations by anyone who didn't have CLEO-friendly motives for doing so, and in fact have been routinely turned away from cheap private accommodations. Very tactical and methodical, but as I've pointed out on many occasions, until recently law enforcement has never been obliged to involve the judiciary in any of their activities described here. In fact, they have made a great effort to avoid judicial review, (but that may change now that Mt. CLEO has grown to massive proportions).

That leaves e-mail, which is the only remaining means of communication due to lack of funds, but also the most susceptible to corruption and tampering. Here are two examples of what happens when I send an e-mail, and the responses which have always been images instead of text. The fax number is removed because I have every reason to think that the call to FBI was either redirected, or that the fax number was bogus and intended to incriminate your humble writer:

<humblejournalist@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:08 PM
Subject: civil rights complaint/FBI fax
To: leon.rodrigues@usdoj.gov
Cc: connie.lee@usdoj.gov

On June 28, 2010 I called the FBI office in Los Angeles from the California EDD office in Pasadena and asked for the fax number of that office. The person that answered gave me the number (XXX) XXX-XXX and I sent fax from that office with the following text:

"I would like to submit the following documents to support a formal complaint of public corruption and violation of civil rights, which I understand is part of the purview of your office.

Those that I have alleged of misconduct include Michael Antonovich, Kurt Zimmerman, John Vandevelde, Casey Gwinn, Dan Lungren, and those with knowledge of these occurrences who may be connected with them, or have acted as proxies.

If there are issues that you wish to discuss that may or may not be connected to this report, please advise."

The reference was to a blog which I suspect is being redirected, and I am certain in has been maliciously altered. It describes in some detail my experiences with residents and officials of Sierra Madre, Ca., including John Andrew Whitcraft, Jr., and many officials in the Los Angeles area who happen to know him, or have knowledge of the occurrences described in essays posted since November 2009, the documentation of which is in my possession.

However, I believe that the call to FBI may have been redirected, and I suspect that the fax number may not be accurate. I have had no indication that it was received and I consider the personnel of the State of California and that particular office hostile to my efforts to bring this the attention of federal authorities, and I have also alleged that they have committed offenses that include theft of documents related to the complaint and my efforts to bring these issues to the judiciary. Since I have no way of verifying receipt of the fax, I am bringing this to your attention with this correspondence.

It would be greatly appreciated if you would acknowledge receipt of this request, along with instructions on how best to proceed.

Dated: August 4, 2010

The reply is in the form of an image, not text, so it is necessary to reproduce it here (because if I don't, any code in the image, a common tactic used by hackers, will also corrupt this essay. My original message was converted into an image as well): 

From: Rodriguez, Leon (CRT)

Date:  Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:00PM

subject: Out of Office Auto Reply: cease and desist

mailed by: usdoj.gov

I will be on leave until Monday, August 30, 2010. I will be checking e-mail and voice mail daily. Additionally, I can be reached at 202 305 5872 for any matters that require immediate attention.

Here is another example, the e-mail using images instead of text, and once the images were pasted into this blog, the text functions no longer worked properly just like the one above, so I had to remove my original messages which had also been converted to an image:

team@hubpages.com

to: humblejournalist@gmail.com

date: Fri. Aug. 12, 2011 at 1:30 PM

subject Re: Lack of Reply

Important mainly because of your interaction with messages in conversation

We have received your email on Aug 2, and replied to it.

Your hubpages account: http://humblejournalist.hubpages.com was last accessed 42 hours ago. If this was not you, then we recommend saving the content of your Hubs and closing the account. Let us know when you are ready to close your account, and we can do it for you.

What they don't mention is that the e-mail was sent more than a year earlier, on August 2, 2010, and there was never a reply. The part that says "Important mainly because of your interaction with messages in the conversation" is a mystery to me. But until I removed the images, the blog didn't function properly, so the e-mails themselves have the potential of controlling the e-mail account and the blog. This has been a constant source of consternation, because while I'm reluctant to open or keep the e-mails, they constitute evidence of what I am describing here, the technical aspects and hazards of official communications with these agencies, and replies to e-mails that are received months or years later from sources that may not be authentic.

Also, when hackers insert code into a document, an e-mail or inadvertently pasted-in to a document that becomes corrupted and saved to storage media or archived in an e-mail account, an Internet connection allows for the code to be deleted by those who put it there. When for instance, I pasted-in the code that corrupted my flash-drive causing it to scan the Internet for hidden files which remain unknown, the code that was used in the document was removed in a very interesting manner. The entire document was removed from the Hubpages account internally. When I accessed the account after the malicious code had been pasted-in to an MS Word document and saved to the flash-drive, the account record displayed "Duplicate" which I didn't understand at the time.

It made a lot of sense once I realized that the content that was pasted-into that essay was the same as that which had corrupted my flash-drive. So while my flash-drive remains corrupted, the pasted-in text from the essay that caused it shows "Duplicate" within the account. Pretty slick these guys, huh? And what was the text that was pasted-in to that document? Go ahead and take a guess . . . That's right, the U.S. Code that pertains to civil rights violations, which was originally Essay 30, but reproduced in Essay 135 from the "Duplicate" that replaced it:  http://burgersonly.hubpages.com/hub/essay135

Of course, that also means that the account itself was hacked, illegally accessed to accomplish that feat; something that has never been in doubt, but still a rather flagrant example of the hackers covering their tracks. (After I pasted in the images above here, the same opportunity was afforded the hackers who designed the code, this blog compromised at least temporarily, but the e-mails remain in the account). Amazingly enough, I was actually describing the effects of the illegal access while they were occurring, or trying to while writing an essay on the subject, and the same thing is occurring now as described in the previous essay. Pisses me off, but all I can do is point out the What, When, Where and How.

But the Who and the Why are rather obvious if you consider motive.

And in fact, when I tried to save this essay, the code that had been part of the images couldn't be deleted. I copied the text into another post, but it would appear that the account has been permanently compromised, as my e-mail account was since the code was introduced.  

© humble journalist

Hijacked: Communications Terminated

Besides making an irrefutable report to law enforcement officials with jurisdiction, something that could not be overlooked, the essays were intended to test Internet services which I described in detail in the first 500 pages of the book. As soon as the first essay was posted, the same issues that I had described earlier began to manifest themselves. The redirection to a malicious URL, illegal access to the account, and in a matter of hours after purchasing a flash-drive to store the text, it became corrupted using the same techniques described. (This occurred when I pasted an essay into a Microsoft Word document, the malicious code hidden in the site, a common tactic used by hackers). Once the corruption had occurred, the flash-drive accumulated hidden files, 2 GB to be specific, and became unusable.

Of course, I was, and continue to be unable to discern the nature of the hidden files, but we know that people like Mike Fiola were victimized by the same sort of programs that actually scanned the Internet for pornography which is why he lost his job, his home and his reputation trying to defend himself against charges associated with the tactic. It is a simple program, a line of code actually, that can infect a computer by way of an e-mail being opened, direct access, hiding it in another program or in the case I observed, pasting the code into a stored document. So I've known for more than two years that two of my flash-drives have indeed been corrupted. I'm sure that law enforcement does as well, another aspect of Access, Corruption and Recovery, so I don't use the flash-drive, but like the mini-DV tapes that were handed to me by the King of the Stooges, they constitute evidence of what I'm discussing here, so I've made no attempt to destroy or dispose of those things.

The subject matter I'm discussing here includes those things, the ACR tactics of law enforcement, malicious code, illegal access to accounts, computer files copied and corrupted while I was detained, and hijacking of communications and accounts. So all of the examples of corruption are significant, as are the instances when they were confiscated, corrupted or when alterations or deletions took place. The hijacking of the accounts that include the essays has been ongoing, and so I've done my best to describe these things as they occur. The deletions are case-specific, targeted for transparent reasons, and the redirect to the URL that was designated as malicious was typical of the subject matter, so I simply made a print that included the URL which disappeared soon after, and continued to write on the subject.

As I mentioned previously, no e-mail account that I've used in the past is accessible to me. That is because the passwords were changed by intruders, and there have been many examples of how parties hostile to my interests have acquired passwords and accessed accounts. Some of those are well-known to the hacking community, but when I use a public computer, stealing passwords is not a problem because they control the servers and the computers. (This is why I found it amusing that after all I've written on the subject, the California EDD ordered me to establish an Internet-based account with their office despite my protests, and why I had to laugh when I saw the "LogMeIn" programmed installed at the computer I started using to post these essays, as well as the run command "control userpasswords2" in the command field. Am I supposed to be too stupid to understand these things after several years of writing on the subject? I guess so. At least in the CLEO Alternate Universe which presumes I'm an uneducated idiot).

Of course all of these tactics are illegal, and the Public Servants who provide access to hostile parties (read CLEO-friendly), do so with malicious intent. The IP Scam, my designation for prints or communications that are falsely attributed to me, has been in progress at every location I've been obliged to use, which is exacerbated by the fact that there are no public computers that do not also have an Internet connection. In other words, I can't use a word processor without also allowing for illegal, malicious access. And it doesn't take long for my storage media to be corrupted because of this, nor is my property secure when law enforcement decides to execute a Raid, Rummage and Ransack mission. What to do?

So knowing these things are part of the law enforcement agenda, I've continued to write while trying to maintain control of the text, with mixed results. I recently perused some of the essays posted at Hubpages and wasn't exactly shocked to see entire segments had disappeared. The segments describing specific examples of law enforcement misconduct or hackery associated with the account were conspicuously absent. What a surprise, huh?

In most cases the alterations target specific dates, reference numbers or the time that a particular example occurred. When, for instance, I described the time/date stamp had been backed up an hour when I logged-on, there was also a conspicuous effort to portray the time of that entry as well. And why do I not find this surprising? Because of all the examples of illegal access, password theft, the IP Scam and other CLEO contrivances, the control of the accounts and servers also allows for destruction of the evidence that it occurred, (except when the evidence of it winds up on internal computers).

Unfortunately for your humble writer, the accounts that have been hijacked can still be attributed to me. I have no way of closing the accounts because I can't access them. Nor do I have any means of controlling what hostile parties might post on the Internet using a photo and perhaps personal information known to law enforcement officials. Obviously, law enforcement has used photos in the past to falsify reports and has provided many examples of the tactics described for the purpose of false attribution, so it would be surprising if they hadn't done something similar with a bogus Internet posting of some kind. I also know that amongst the stolen property law enforcement refuses to acknowledge, are photos that would be useful to them for the same reasons, but more importantly to me when I made those reports was that the documents that showed that these things were described to them as early as 2005 were also stolen. In other words, law enforcement officials by way of Kevin M. Cimarusti and John Andrew Whitcraft, Jr., destroyed evidence of official reports that pertained to the thefts before they occurred, as well as documentation that pertained to the identity theft issues ten years earlier. How's that for controlling the environment?

But we will proceed with the knowledge that the Internet is a hostile environment with many hazards for anyone targeted by law enforcement, as well as those of us who would like to maintain control over our accounts, the text associated with them and the attribution of hijacked accounts. I've already described, and documented, the fact that I was redirected to a counterfeit website where bogus phone records were displayed. The conspicuous effort to preclude comparison of those records with internal records made it clear that there was some red meat so to speak.

But prior to that I knew that phone service was redirected anyway. One of the reasons I established the account was to prove it, and it didn't take long before I found myself talking to people who had no idea where their company was located, or other basic information like the Time Zone where they were located, which resulted in some comical exchanges between myself and the alleged "representatives" of those companies or agencies. After the bogus phone records at the counterfeit site were noted, printed and brought to the attention of the representatives who became visibly perturbed and defensive, there was no point participating in the charade any longer, so I discontinued service.

Later, however, I had a very good reason to make a call because the Elder Abuse Hotline was the only means of doing so. I sent certified mail to Steve Cooley directly, but Adult Protective Services was the agency with jurisdiction over that matter. When I called APS, I was told to call another number for a "local" representative who would be handling the complaint. But instead of calling it, knowing from experience that it was futile, I did a Google search and found a location associated with that number. I decided to visit the address and see who was actually there, whether APS had an office there which seemed doubtful.

What I found was the office of an attorney who wasn't available to speak to, but hanging on the wall I saw a portrait photo, presumably including the female attorney, of several dozen military personnel in uniforms along with some other military memorabilia. Obviously, the phone number I had been given was not Adult Protective Services, nor was the office suitable for any such endeavor. But as if to add some comedy to the exercise, the people staffing the office told me that it was once used by Social Services which may have accounted for the mistake. (This is why the primary effort here is to separate the Bullshit from the Burgers).

At this point, 10:24 a.m. on August 31, 2011, I will save this post in the hope that the text will be preserved and continue with this post later.

© humble journalist

And in so doing, we were supplied with the proof of what is described above. When I tried to save and close the account, I got the following display instead:  

"Blogger: An error occurred. CONFLICTING EDITS. There was more than one attempt to edit this resource at the same time. This may have been because you double clicked on a link or a button or because someone else is also editing this blog or post. Please hit the back button on your browser and try again. If the problem persists, please contact the Blogger Help Group. We apologize for any inconvenience" 

And of course, the loyal Public Servant, the CLEO Stooge, the IT Tech who is controlling the server was at her terminal when it occurred, so the tug-of-war continues, the First Amendment another CLEO casualty. Most of the time I haven't actually witnessed it, but because of the configuration of the library, the personnel involved with illegal access are rather obvious. The printout of this message was made a few minutes after the above essay was posted and shows a time of 10:28 a.m. August 31, 2011. Thanks for the demo.