Return Of Essay 29

Report of Misconduct

Federal Bureau of Investigation; Andre Birotte, U.S. Attorney for CACD; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General for the State of California; Steven Cooley, District Attorney, County of Los Angeles.


I herewith allege the following:


That on or about June 8, 2010 and again on June 11, 2010 and on several occasions since, State of California employees committed theft of court documents and exhibits to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California at the at the California Employment Development Department offices (EDD) in Pasadena.


That on or about June 28, 2010, State of California employees redirected phone service to an official agency, misdirected a fax report required to for the business of the U.S. District Court, an official report of misconduct against their office and personnel, and illegally accessed account information and documents, with the deliberative intent of interfering with litigation against the State of California, the City of Pasadena and sub-agencies and others named as defendants, in violation of the Rules and Procedures of the U.S. District Court and the U.S. Code.


That on or about July 6, 2010 and again on July 8, 2010, State of California employees did maliciously attack and corrupt storage media, illegally accessed personal accounts, corrupted and/or disabled those account with malicious intent, and committed theft of property; specifically original document “Addendum to Complaint” and printed copy of  “13. Ceast and Desist” exhibit to the U.S. District Court, with malicious intent and in violation of provisions of the U.S. Code specified below.


That on or about July 25, 2010 State of California employees directed proxies to handle court documents, exhibits and other articles and materials for the purpose of intimidation and harassment, and possibly the theft of those items, as well as to prevent access to the public facilities necessary for access to the courts and the business, rules and procedures of those courts.


That these acts constitute violations of §§ Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245.


Dated: July 29, 2010

This essay somehow disappeared, then reappeared after it was posted on the date above. As far as I know, there was no malicious code because nothing was pasted into it, but by that time my flash-drive I used to store documents had been corrupted (and remains that way). When Essay 30 became a "Duplicate" it was for the simple reason that the rather sophisticated parties that can accomplish that feat also have the capacity to hack the account, and replaced the original Essay 30 with the "Duplicate" which was referred to earlier. They had to. Because had that document not been replaced the code that was used to corrupt my flash drive would have been posted on the Internet, easily decipherable to anyone with the expertise to analyze the code.

While I understand the tactics, the techniques and especially the motives and the parties that are obviously hostile to my journalistic endeavors, it remains a mystery as to what can be done to stop them. I've noted the constant, incessant attacks on this account for instance, but on the occasions I have attempted to deal with these things with the reporting mechanisms available, there has been no legitimate reply. "Hey, Google, my e-mail account is so corrupted no one gets my e-mails, and if I ever get a reply it is a year or more later after I post the original e-mail on the Internet. What to do?" And guess what? I've never gotten a reply from Google either, which isn't to say they ever received it, because the account is only usable to the extent that the servers and the IT Techs and the 14 or so points where packets are exchanged allow for it. You don't complain about your handset phone when you know the lines are down. It ain't the phone.

But the essays as I've emphasized before, were intended to compensate for the lack of response by law enforcement officials with jurisdiction to legitimate reports of criminality. Since it became obvious that those reports also referred to crimes in progress, I thought it was worthwhile to do everything I could to communicate the information using whatever means possible. I knew those who had put so much effort into avoiding acknowledgment of the reports might see it as antagonistic on my part, but there has never been any malice intended in my lawful and rather routine efforts to make official reports to those with jurisdiction.

On the contrary, I knew that when that much in the way of personal belongings ends up in the hands of people who will do anything to cover up their criminality, I was in serious jeopardy. And it wasn't long before I realized that my assessment was correct. That property began to show up in places that were clearly intended to incriminate me in crimes I had nothing to do with. It was clearly transported for that purpose. It was passed around by law enforcement officials in different jurisdictions, and I've never had any means of recovering it or even making a report of it.

To me, that is all screwed up, especially when one considers that potential consequences for your humble writer as I watched my remaining possessions disappear or become similar vehicles for corruption or misplacement by the officials that confiscated, (or simply stole) them using color of authority. So it got to the point where I basically said "Who the f*** do these people think they are anyway?" The answer, of course, was obvious. They are the people who can steal your mail, redirect your phone calls and make sure you never send or receive an e-mail. They are the people who can access your blog anytime they want and make any sort of alterations or deletions that suits their purposes. They are the people who can make database entries to produce a printout that shows that you have a longer record than Al Capone. That's who they are, and collectively the PMAPS have a shitload of power and authority.

So what to do? Well, without the funds to do much of anything besides describe my experience, that has been the only thing possible. And until someone in the law enforcement community acknowledges these report, as well as the other things I have not mentioned here, then I'm more or less obligated to point out how these things have directly effected me. (And that that doesn't even count the Access and Corruption that I am aware of that occurred when law enforcement gained possession of my remaining possessions). But hey, we're all adults here and journalism is what it is. Bullshit is what it is. And malicious code does what it does. So I will continue to address these issues to the best of ability for the benefit of the judiciary, the general population and for my own amusement.

© humble journalist

Stooge Attack

So as I sit to write another essay, we see all the usual suspects congregating to perform the CLEO IP Scam, (log-in at 12:23 on September 1, 2011), with the expectation that some sort of CLEO-friendly communication or printout will be the result. Remember that these people are very clever. So clever in fact, that over the last twenty years, with access provided by Kevin M. Cimarusti and John Andrew Whitcraft, Jr., they have had more control over my property than I have. And since Whitcraft recorded his fraudulent General Power of Attorney document, enforced by nose-picking half-wits like "Fairlane" Ford, the rest of my property was either stolen or corrupted and returned by law enforcement.

So on many occasions I've asked, "Why can't law enforcement find a way to enforce the law without accessing my property first?" which also applies to Internet-based accounts like this one. Because it hasn't escaped my notice that since May 2007 when I made that two-page theft report, law enforcement personnel have constantly found ways to take possession of my property, then hand it back to me, either minus important documents, or in a corrupted state, and in no instance have anything resembling legitimate charges ever resulted.

But that may be changing, as we have seen Mt. CLEO grow to enormous proportions, one dirt clod at a time supplied by those law enforcement officials with the most culpability or liability, those jurisdictions and some of their antics described in these essays. And of course, it has become rather obvious that bogus complaints and falsified reports are the dirt clods, America's Heroes handing themselves "evidence" that has become Mt. CLEO. Meanwhile, knowing the Who and the Why that law enforcement has conspicuously subtracted from the equations, I have endeavored to stay focus on the subjects that are not susceptible to prevarication, corruption or theft; those issues that I consider to be significant for a number of reasons beyond their usefulness as vehicles for CLEO aggression.

Since we've discussed hijacked communications to the extent possible due to lack of cooperation by those who have (yawn) stolen, blocked, redirected or corrupted mail, phone and e-mails, along with accurate records of them, we are left with the few existing communications, usually e-mails which are indicators of CLEO activities and aggression as all communications and stooge attacks are, keeping in mind that there is always a CLEO scam in progress regardless of where I am or what I happen to be doing. Anything I could possibly do has either been criminalized or become part of an investigation by The Good Guys who are committed to protecting America from destitute journalists. Here is our latest example, the date and address images instead of text. This is an important point, because it is images that have routinely been switched within accounts, and also have the most potential for malicious code to become part of, let's say, a blog like this one.

When an image is used in any Internet-based environment, it becomes a vehicle for hackers, and when I started writing on the subject the first pages are devoted to e-mails received from the Sierra Madre Police Department no less, that used images instead of text and Rich Text with the same capability that I found out later had corrupted my computer and all of my storage media before I realized it what had occurred. (This is why the only image you will find here is that of George W. Bush, but Microsoft is still struggling with Rich Text problems that hackers have been exploiting for years. See Microsoft "Problems" catalog.)

Here is the most recent e-mail which is probably a direct result of the essays that discuss the incident, but also an opportunity for L.A. County to "investigate" their own CLEO stooges, or to turn it into another falsified report which, no doubt, will determine that I was the perpetrator. But if nothing else, it will also determine the identity of the cowardly, worm-like wanna-be cop which would be interesting to find out. If so, it will be reported here. 

Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:12 PM
jgarriso@da.lacounty.gov The law requires that the agency involved to make an internal affairs investigation regarding citizen's complaints. If probable cause exists to believe a law enforcement officer has committed a crime they will forward the case to our office. Since you case involves LASD Deputies you should contact their complaint line at (800) 698-8255

So I've converted the images to text here, because I had to delete the entire "Somebody Is Lying" essay that included e-mails because even after I tried to delete just the images, they remained embedded in the document. These embedded images that can also be part of a maliciously constructed website, burrow into the document and provide "placeholders" for images to be inserted through an Internet connection any time hackers choose. And of course, they can also insert any sort of image they would like once the embedded "placeholder" becomes part of the document. This problem is exacerbated by programs that actively scan the Internet for images, which is likely what happened to Michael Fiola and perhaps thousands of others who didn't know their computer had become an Incrimination Machine due to malicious code they had inadvertently picked up browsing the Internet, pasting text that contained malicious code into a document that was stored on their computer or storage media, or opening an e-mail.

These devices are well-know to hackers, as are the many ways to acquire someone's passwords or other personal information. This is no big secret as we have seen that hundreds of millions of accounts have been invaded, the data stolen or destroyed, since "Questioning the Internet" was posted. (The link to the Associated Press article on Michael Fiola was broken, so here is an article at Huffington Post that refers to that piece. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/09/internet-virus-frames-use_n_350426.html )

What has amazed me since I started watching how this story developed, knowing that my storage media had filled itself with several GB's of hidden files as described in "Somebody Is Lying" below, was that prosecutors acted as if they were totally oblivious to the fact that trojans, viruses and malicious code existed. Of course, the PMAPS have no interest in becoming educated, only accusing people. But when I started writing on this subject in August 2007 it was because I already knew my computer and storage media had been corrupted, and after doing some research, it wasn't difficult to figure out those two crucial W's, the Who and Why.

To some extent the corruption was through direct access, physical possession of my belongings. On other occasions through an Internet connection, but once copies had been made of all my files, including those saved from prior to when the corruption occurred, the originals were clearly targeted by law enforcement and military slime like the crooked, alleged "pastor" Dave Mack of Monrovia, Ca. After that storage media went missing after law enforcement or military slime had gained possession or was destroyed by people who somehow knew the originals existed, much like the IDs, employment records, dated photos, memorabilia, postmarked correspondence and other articles were targeted.

So there came a time when, after multiple Access and Corruption incidents, mostly staged or contrived by law enforcement, I was only left with those things that law enforcement wanted to Recover to complete the ACR formula. Now I've never made a secret of any of this, and in fact have made repeated attempt to report these things as well, partly for my own protection since I have known since they occurred that the How and Why were critical to the ACR equation. And also knowing that the access points where I was separated from my possessions were clearly orchestrated for that purpose, just like Raid, Rummage and Ransack attacks have been.

At this point, hoping to preserve text in its original form, I will move to the next posting (which of course caused the text frame to lock up when I tried to save it. Apparently the IT Tech won't be caught off guard again. The time is 1:35 p.m. on September 1, 2011). But before I post it, I am saving the text to the clipboard, so when the alterations and deletions that have occurred when the "draft saved" version replaces this one, I will be able to copy the original text to another document. So f*** you IT Techs, Public Servants who control the servers I'm obliged to use, and those who have used illegal access to perform that trick repeatedly in the past.

And one more notation: When I tried to sign out of the account, the sign out was redirected. So did I actually sign out? Can I sign out? Or is that how the IT Tech will maintain control once I leave? More fascinating Internet-base questions to come, but the Who and Why remain constant, because I'm not the guy hacking my own essays to pieces or has a motive to leave his account open, or to allow asshole IT Techs to share my blog space while I'm writing. 1:50 p.m. Sept. 1, 2011.

© humble journalist

"Red Meat (I will use that term as a matter of convenience and brevity to designate any information that is conspicuously concealed, hidden or destroyed)." Note that this reference was deleted after seeing CLEO stooges buzzing your humble writer with red hats. (I'm not kidding). If this is supposed to be CLEOs idea of a "secret code" scenario, knowing that CLEOs have a propensity for this sort of thing to justify their super-covert, law enforcement professional surveillance capabilities and the Perpetual Investigation, I will remind them that this issue was dealt with more than a year ago. There is only one acceptable "secret code" that will be recognized here. Bouffant hairdos. And besides, a reference to red meat doesn't include anything red; it would be too confusing, because like Mr. Blackwell outfits, there's too many of them. So until I see someone with a T-bone steak tied to their head, I will try and ignore the antics of CLEO stooges. Are you getting all this Judge Miller? Because what is, and has been required since I started writing on these subjects, is adult supervision, something that has been conspicuously lacking by all parties involved.

Link to excerpts: http://humbleexcerpts.blogspot.com

The CLEO Comedy: Part II

Note the hacking of this piece below, which occurred above the tenth paragraph. The passages above were deleted, the sentence obviously indicative of the separation point. I will attempt to reconstruct in a simplified manner, that which was altered and deleted for rather obvious reasons. (I was discussing the subject of illegal access, the Who and the Why, so the deletions are, once again, rather self-explanatory as far as motive). But it raises the question that has prevailed throughout. Why would anyone think it was necessary to attack the account and delete even a single word? Who has a motive to do so? And why is this a continuing problem, something that is clearly illegal, malicious and destructive? When the perpetrators of these attacks remove passages, alter text or engage in falsification to those things attributable to me, they provide the Why which is usually a fairly good indicator of Who. Why for instance, was a "Bobblehead" character necessary in the first place, another CLEO stooge a requisite to perform the ridiculous affectations and proximity posing necessary to conjure up another falsehood? 

These are the indications of the holes in the CLEO dike, the things that require proactive measures including obfuscation, falsification or other contrivances to support their agenda. But what we see below is another example of a criminal act perpetrated against your humble writer. Breaking and entering. Theft. Illegal access to an account, the ingress provided by Public Servants who have never feared consequences, let alone prosecution, for any of the crimes they have committed against me or my mother. The reconstructed sentences are highlighted in yellow.  

I should have mentioned in the previous essay that FBI was supplied with a cover letter that included a link address for the first 29 essays, the response to the lack of interest by those with jurisdiction. But the civil rights violations that pervade the story are significant as well, at least to me. This is one of the many annoyances, for lack of a better word, that I have been obliged to deal with since the law enforcement community realized that it was likely I would figure out the sequence of events described here.

You see, law enforcement has always known that I am not an uneducated, ex-military drug-addict and they also knew there were some serious liability issues associated with the misconduct described here. So when the first Raid, Rummage and Ransack attack occurred on May 4, 2007 it was a harbinger for things to come. In simple terms, they hit the panic button when the benefits of lying far outweighed the consequences of telling the truth.

This caused a predictable series of events that I refer to as CLEO aggression which continue to this day. It has been my opinion all along that it was the California DMV and a few law enforcement officials in San Diego that were the most culpable, but as it became apparent that others were involved as well, my property disappeared, the cops became stalkers in a desperate attempt to either destroy or acquire photos, and I found that anyone who approached me was either affiliated with the military, law enforcement or both, because the agenda from that point forward was completely dependent on theft of property and complaints; a two track effort to contain knowledge of the scam from becoming known to anyone outside the military-law enforcement communities; those who obviously knew that a crime was still in progress. In fact, it was that desperation (and Chris Zimmerman's comment) that led me to believe that "some blonde guy" was indeed running around with a fraudulent ID.

It also led me to believe that the June 4, 1997 court orders had indeed been violated, as if they had been invalidated by the thefts that had occurred since. That others had picked up where Michael E. Bartley had left off when he pled guilty to perjury, ending the CLEO charade, but not the retroactive assignment of his criminal record to your humble writer by way of the DA Number Scam. But since I understand the reasoning behind the CLEO aggression, the stooge activity, the hacking of accounts, the fabrication of "evidence" and the many devices used for false attribution common to CLEOs, I decided to take a practical approach by doing my best to describe these things.

The Perpetual Investigation continues, Mt. CLEO has grown to enormous proportions, CLEO aggression has reached a ridiculous point that requires a cast of thousands, harassment by military slime and CLEO proxies has reached new record levels as well, and the volume of complaints and falsified reports, the basis for all things CLEO, seems to be commensurate with my efforts to accurately describe in detail what was once a simple, two-page theft report.

But there have also been sources of amusement, because the notion of a simple theft report turning into such a big deal has its moments. The clownish behavior of CLEO stooges for example really has to be witnessed to be believed. One has to see people rushing towards you or following you into a restroom to make a cell call, or chasing you down the street in high-heels, or bolting through traffic to establish proximity for a photo-op to actually believe it. Or the way CLEO stooges just happen to appear whenever and wherever I happen to be, even if it is only for a few moments. Do all these people sit around waiting for the cops to call them with instructions? Yeah, as a matter of fact, they do. Because on several occasions I've seen CLEO stooges rushing to get to a point that is a likely destination, often breaking the law, or putting themselves or their kids in danger to do it.

cking cell phone that they can use somewhere besides where I'm sitting? Am I supposed to be an antenna for you assholes?

Another source of annoyance is the fact that I am obliged to throttle my humble attitude. Take, for instance, the morning of this post, August 31, 2011 where you will see that this account was demonstrably hacked as it has been since the first post. Though I can't prove it because the evidence and the hardware is controlled by the Guardians of Literacy and Free Speech, it is likely that another IT Tech has illegally invaded, or provided access to, the small amount of property that I call my own. Now when Ms. Honey first saw me, she couldn't help smirking as if to say, "Don't worry Public Servants, I can roll this guy under the technology bus and he'll never know what hit him." But of course, during my last encounter, she looked visibly upset, barely containing her anger and angst after the post that pointed out that she had not only committed several crimes, but had also left the evidence of it all over the place. (Or she may have been suffering from the worst case of PMS I've ever seen).

But on this occasion I signed out quickly and unexpectedly, causing the display shown in that essay. The Hubpages account does not display that information, so as I watched deletions to text, it could only be described, those descriptions often deleted as well. This proves that unauthorized access occurs after I log-in, something that could only be known to the people present, and also a requisite for CLEO stooges who have perpetrated the variations of the IP Scam for the purpose of falsely attributing printed materials to your humble writer. The illegal access to the account and the subsequent alterations and deletions, must be perpetrated by those with knowledge of my log-in and control of the systems and servers. 

That narrows the field of suspects to those who also happen to have a motive. In this instance, the access is clearly the result of the IT Tech simply sitting in her office watching my log-ins and log-outs, but she didn't expect me to sign out so quickly and was unprepared to do likewise at that moment, so the display proves, once and for all that the alterations and deletions occur from within the facility because the "LogMeIn" program was disabled prior to log-in to the account. That makes her a criminal, possibly a "Bobblehead" candidate as well who might fabricate a story about how she was "helping" me to write these essays. She doesn't have much of a choice at this point, because there is no longer any doubt that the account was attacked, that passages were removed and that there could only be one reason for those deletions, none of them consistent with my interests, all of them consistent with CLEO interests and contrivances witnessed, documented and described over a period of years.

CLEOs from the account as I've always suspected, and that the text deletions that have plagued my accounts were only possible because of illegal access provided by the Public Servants that control them. (The IP Scam, the false attribution of printouts from the same IP was easy to figure knowing what I do about CLEO false attribution tactics, but doing it from inside the account was only known to me because I watched the alterations and deletions as I wrestled for control with the IT Techs who always won because the could lock me out for long enough to do it, or blocking the Internet connection while they did).

So another IT Tech was walked into a trap set by your humble writer, but the most annoying aspect is that I am obliged to be civil with these people, Public Servants, nose-picking half-wits, and even IT Techs who prove to be criminals, otherwise someone will make a complaint about my attitude and the cops will show up. And it is much the same with CLEO stooges, military slime and cowardly, worm-like, wanna-be cops who are nothing more than stalkers looking for an opportunity to provoke, incite or harass your humble writer.

The other annoyance I will end this essay with, due to time restrictions, are the cops who are always investigating something, allegedly, but have never come right out and asked me anything resembling a simple question. I've never tried to conceal either my identity, my location, or anything else. So what's with all the super-covert, law enforcement professional surveillance crap anyway? Every time I make a report the cops are hiding under their desks, but the rest of the time they're out there acting like the guys in all the bad cop dramas that went off the air a long time ago. In the twenty years that are described in these essays, I've never had an opportunity to litigate or participate in the adjudication of anything described in a police report, any charges that resulted from a complaint, and means of defending myself against slander. So what's up with that?

You want something to investigate? Try explaining why every document I can find, all the court records, and even Lasher's comical attempt at creative dialog describe Michael E. Bartley as having blue eyes. I do not. My eyes are dark brown, very dark brown, and always have been. So before I waste any more time pointing out the ridiculous discrepancies in the CLEO Alternate Universe where falsified reports and bogus database entries prevail, how about someone tackling that single issue, and in the meantime I'll be engaged in analyzing and describing the subjects that are more interesting and significant that the stupidity found in police reports.  

Are you getting all this Judge Miller? I hope so.

© humble journalist 

Somebody Is Lying

I could spend a lot of time and space describing hijacked mail services, but suffice it to say that beyond the accounts already published I have more than a hundred certified mail receipts with varying results. On some occasions the USPS freely admitted the mail was not delivered. "We regret to inform you . . . " or acknowledgement of non-delivery either in person or the USPS website. The fact that on several occasions USPS supervisors refused to supply their records of delivery was not unexpected, just more Red Meat that pertains to the activities of some of our Public Servants. The certified mail receipts I'm referring to remain in my possession, but the addressees have never confirmed delivery themselves, and in fact usually claim that the correspondence wasn't received.

This leaves us with a choice between say, Marilyn Diaz and Steve Cooley, who have disavowed knowledge of reports and correspondence for the reasons described here, or the Public Servants who allegedly brave rain, sleet and snow to deliver those official communications. Somebody is lying. This has been the only conclusion I've been able to reach in any discussions with either party on this subject. So we'll have to leave it at that for the moment.

Phone services are more interesting, but also more difficult to document or prove. Back in the day, when I thought phone calls would result in speaking to the person that I intended to call, I was often given bogus information or none at all. I could call the same person a hundred times and get their voice mail, for instance. When I didn't have a personal communication device, I would be put on hold, sometimes indefinitely while my supply of change disappeared. After forty minutes or so, without the funds to remain on hold, the effort would be terminated for practical reasons. Once the bogus phone records were displayed on the counterfeit website in April of 2008, I saw no reason to waste money on phone service when the byproduct was nothing more than CLEO contrivances that were obviously variations of false attribution.

(Of course, since then, CLEO Stooges have become a nuisance, making desperate attempts to establish proximity while conspicuously using their personal communication devices. Another aspect of CLEO Logic that makes no sense to me. The people I have seen that try to establish proximity are not the sort of people I would trust for any reason, especially communicating on my behalf. But CLEO storylines are only known to CLEOs and their stooges, so I have reasoned that the destination of those calls is the key to CLEO bullshit. Whatever. It is not something I have any control over anyway, so it will have to remain a mystery for the moment, two more missing W's). 

So this leaves us with those things I say, or have said, in public or outdoors where CLEOs can record them, and e-mails. Now there have been a number of occasions when my spoken words were recorded, and I mentioned an incident early on to illustrate the point, the "Go f*** a porcupine" example, which may or may not end up on someone's voice mail. But most of the time CLEO stooges try to lead me into saying something that serves CLEO purposes. Without going into all the occurrences over the years, by far the most common is asking how much something costs or what did I pay for something.

The intent is rather obvious. If I answer the question, I have provided a recording that can be used by CLEOs in any number of voice-over scenarios. Cops have done this sort of things on many occasions, during stop, search and question occurrences which are fairly constant. "Where are you from? Where are you going? Where were you born? Have you ever been arrested?" and so on, which in many cases may provides a recording that can be used in a manner consistent with CLEO storylines because there is no time/date stamp associated with anything I've ever said. Taken out of context, these recordings can be used in a variety of ways, perhaps even used as supplements or proof of proximity when script-readers goes into a recital which is transcribed later.

They are also useful when CLEOs execute the Abandoned Shopping Bag scam, because all they really want to do is establish identity and location just before they go back into the bushes and retrieve the ASB they put there a few minutes before. But for the most part, connecting me to CLEO Stooges is the primary goal, and this only requires proximity, so it is rare to find anything resembling solitude for even a few moments because CLEO scams are always in progress, and they must be supported not only by the stooges, but establishment of identity and location either by vocalizations, surveillance cameras, or the drive-by's by cops that accompany stooge activity.

The fact that CLEOs have relied on my exposure to these tactics, has always been of paramount importance, so it isn't surprising that I have never been offered private accommodations by anyone who didn't have CLEO-friendly motives for doing so, and in fact have been routinely turned away from cheap private accommodations. Very tactical and methodical, but as I've pointed out on many occasions, until recently law enforcement has never been obliged to involve the judiciary in any of their activities described here. In fact, they have made a great effort to avoid judicial review, (but that may change now that Mt. CLEO has grown to massive proportions).

That leaves e-mail, which is the only remaining means of communication due to lack of funds, but also the most susceptible to corruption and tampering. Here are two examples of what happens when I send an e-mail, and the responses which have always been images instead of text. The fax number is removed because I have every reason to think that the call to FBI was either redirected, or that the fax number was bogus and intended to incriminate your humble writer:

<humblejournalist@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:08 PM
Subject: civil rights complaint/FBI fax
To: leon.rodrigues@usdoj.gov
Cc: connie.lee@usdoj.gov

On June 28, 2010 I called the FBI office in Los Angeles from the California EDD office in Pasadena and asked for the fax number of that office. The person that answered gave me the number (XXX) XXX-XXX and I sent fax from that office with the following text:

"I would like to submit the following documents to support a formal complaint of public corruption and violation of civil rights, which I understand is part of the purview of your office.

Those that I have alleged of misconduct include Michael Antonovich, Kurt Zimmerman, John Vandevelde, Casey Gwinn, Dan Lungren, and those with knowledge of these occurrences who may be connected with them, or have acted as proxies.

If there are issues that you wish to discuss that may or may not be connected to this report, please advise."

The reference was to a blog which I suspect is being redirected, and I am certain in has been maliciously altered. It describes in some detail my experiences with residents and officials of Sierra Madre, Ca., including John Andrew Whitcraft, Jr., and many officials in the Los Angeles area who happen to know him, or have knowledge of the occurrences described in essays posted since November 2009, the documentation of which is in my possession.

However, I believe that the call to FBI may have been redirected, and I suspect that the fax number may not be accurate. I have had no indication that it was received and I consider the personnel of the State of California and that particular office hostile to my efforts to bring this the attention of federal authorities, and I have also alleged that they have committed offenses that include theft of documents related to the complaint and my efforts to bring these issues to the judiciary. Since I have no way of verifying receipt of the fax, I am bringing this to your attention with this correspondence.

It would be greatly appreciated if you would acknowledge receipt of this request, along with instructions on how best to proceed.

Dated: August 4, 2010

The reply is in the form of an image, not text, so it is necessary to reproduce it here (because if I don't, any code in the image, a common tactic used by hackers, will also corrupt this essay. My original message was converted into an image as well): 

From: Rodriguez, Leon (CRT)

Date:  Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:00PM

subject: Out of Office Auto Reply: cease and desist

mailed by: usdoj.gov

I will be on leave until Monday, August 30, 2010. I will be checking e-mail and voice mail daily. Additionally, I can be reached at 202 305 5872 for any matters that require immediate attention.

Here is another example, the e-mail using images instead of text, and once the images were pasted into this blog, the text functions no longer worked properly just like the one above, so I had to remove my original messages which had also been converted to an image:

team@hubpages.com

to: humblejournalist@gmail.com

date: Fri. Aug. 12, 2011 at 1:30 PM

subject Re: Lack of Reply

Important mainly because of your interaction with messages in conversation

We have received your email on Aug 2, and replied to it.

Your hubpages account: http://humblejournalist.hubpages.com was last accessed 42 hours ago. If this was not you, then we recommend saving the content of your Hubs and closing the account. Let us know when you are ready to close your account, and we can do it for you.

What they don't mention is that the e-mail was sent more than a year earlier, on August 2, 2010, and there was never a reply. The part that says "Important mainly because of your interaction with messages in the conversation" is a mystery to me. But until I removed the images, the blog didn't function properly, so the e-mails themselves have the potential of controlling the e-mail account and the blog. This has been a constant source of consternation, because while I'm reluctant to open or keep the e-mails, they constitute evidence of what I am describing here, the technical aspects and hazards of official communications with these agencies, and replies to e-mails that are received months or years later from sources that may not be authentic.

Also, when hackers insert code into a document, an e-mail or inadvertently pasted-in to a document that becomes corrupted and saved to storage media or archived in an e-mail account, an Internet connection allows for the code to be deleted by those who put it there. When for instance, I pasted-in the code that corrupted my flash-drive causing it to scan the Internet for hidden files which remain unknown, the code that was used in the document was removed in a very interesting manner. The entire document was removed from the Hubpages account internally. When I accessed the account after the malicious code had been pasted-in to an MS Word document and saved to the flash-drive, the account record displayed "Duplicate" which I didn't understand at the time.

It made a lot of sense once I realized that the content that was pasted-into that essay was the same as that which had corrupted my flash-drive. So while my flash-drive remains corrupted, the pasted-in text from the essay that caused it shows "Duplicate" within the account. Pretty slick these guys, huh? And what was the text that was pasted-in to that document? Go ahead and take a guess . . . That's right, the U.S. Code that pertains to civil rights violations, which was originally Essay 30, but reproduced in Essay 135 from the "Duplicate" that replaced it:  http://burgersonly.hubpages.com/hub/essay135

Of course, that also means that the account itself was hacked, illegally accessed to accomplish that feat; something that has never been in doubt, but still a rather flagrant example of the hackers covering their tracks. (After I pasted in the images above here, the same opportunity was afforded the hackers who designed the code, this blog compromised at least temporarily, but the e-mails remain in the account). Amazingly enough, I was actually describing the effects of the illegal access while they were occurring, or trying to while writing an essay on the subject, and the same thing is occurring now as described in the previous essay. Pisses me off, but all I can do is point out the What, When, Where and How.

But the Who and the Why are rather obvious if you consider motive.

And in fact, when I tried to save this essay, the code that had been part of the images couldn't be deleted. I copied the text into another post, but it would appear that the account has been permanently compromised, as my e-mail account was since the code was introduced.  

© humble journalist

Hijacked: Communications Terminated

Besides making an irrefutable report to law enforcement officials with jurisdiction, something that could not be overlooked, the essays were intended to test Internet services which I described in detail in the first 500 pages of the book. As soon as the first essay was posted, the same issues that I had described earlier began to manifest themselves. The redirection to a malicious URL, illegal access to the account, and in a matter of hours after purchasing a flash-drive to store the text, it became corrupted using the same techniques described. (This occurred when I pasted an essay into a Microsoft Word document, the malicious code hidden in the site, a common tactic used by hackers). Once the corruption had occurred, the flash-drive accumulated hidden files, 2 GB to be specific, and became unusable.

Of course, I was, and continue to be unable to discern the nature of the hidden files, but we know that people like Mike Fiola were victimized by the same sort of programs that actually scanned the Internet for pornography which is why he lost his job, his home and his reputation trying to defend himself against charges associated with the tactic. It is a simple program, a line of code actually, that can infect a computer by way of an e-mail being opened, direct access, hiding it in another program or in the case I observed, pasting the code into a stored document. So I've known for more than two years that two of my flash-drives have indeed been corrupted. I'm sure that law enforcement does as well, another aspect of Access, Corruption and Recovery, so I don't use the flash-drive, but like the mini-DV tapes that were handed to me by the King of the Stooges, they constitute evidence of what I'm discussing here, so I've made no attempt to destroy or dispose of those things.

The subject matter I'm discussing here includes those things, the ACR tactics of law enforcement, malicious code, illegal access to accounts, computer files copied and corrupted while I was detained, and hijacking of communications and accounts. So all of the examples of corruption are significant, as are the instances when they were confiscated, corrupted or when alterations or deletions took place. The hijacking of the accounts that include the essays has been ongoing, and so I've done my best to describe these things as they occur. The deletions are case-specific, targeted for transparent reasons, and the redirect to the URL that was designated as malicious was typical of the subject matter, so I simply made a print that included the URL which disappeared soon after, and continued to write on the subject.

As I mentioned previously, no e-mail account that I've used in the past is accessible to me. That is because the passwords were changed by intruders, and there have been many examples of how parties hostile to my interests have acquired passwords and accessed accounts. Some of those are well-known to the hacking community, but when I use a public computer, stealing passwords is not a problem because they control the servers and the computers. (This is why I found it amusing that after all I've written on the subject, the California EDD ordered me to establish an Internet-based account with their office despite my protests, and why I had to laugh when I saw the "LogMeIn" programmed installed at the computer I started using to post these essays, as well as the run command "control userpasswords2" in the command field. Am I supposed to be too stupid to understand these things after several years of writing on the subject? I guess so. At least in the CLEO Alternate Universe which presumes I'm an uneducated idiot).

Of course all of these tactics are illegal, and the Public Servants who provide access to hostile parties (read CLEO-friendly), do so with malicious intent. The IP Scam, my designation for prints or communications that are falsely attributed to me, has been in progress at every location I've been obliged to use, which is exacerbated by the fact that there are no public computers that do not also have an Internet connection. In other words, I can't use a word processor without also allowing for illegal, malicious access. And it doesn't take long for my storage media to be corrupted because of this, nor is my property secure when law enforcement decides to execute a Raid, Rummage and Ransack mission. What to do?

So knowing these things are part of the law enforcement agenda, I've continued to write while trying to maintain control of the text, with mixed results. I recently perused some of the essays posted at Hubpages and wasn't exactly shocked to see entire segments had disappeared. The segments describing specific examples of law enforcement misconduct or hackery associated with the account were conspicuously absent. What a surprise, huh?

In most cases the alterations target specific dates, reference numbers or the time that a particular example occurred. When, for instance, I described the time/date stamp had been backed up an hour when I logged-on, there was also a conspicuous effort to portray the time of that entry as well. And why do I not find this surprising? Because of all the examples of illegal access, password theft, the IP Scam and other CLEO contrivances, the control of the accounts and servers also allows for destruction of the evidence that it occurred, (except when the evidence of it winds up on internal computers).

Unfortunately for your humble writer, the accounts that have been hijacked can still be attributed to me. I have no way of closing the accounts because I can't access them. Nor do I have any means of controlling what hostile parties might post on the Internet using a photo and perhaps personal information known to law enforcement officials. Obviously, law enforcement has used photos in the past to falsify reports and has provided many examples of the tactics described for the purpose of false attribution, so it would be surprising if they hadn't done something similar with a bogus Internet posting of some kind. I also know that amongst the stolen property law enforcement refuses to acknowledge, are photos that would be useful to them for the same reasons, but more importantly to me when I made those reports was that the documents that showed that these things were described to them as early as 2005 were also stolen. In other words, law enforcement officials by way of Kevin M. Cimarusti and John Andrew Whitcraft, Jr., destroyed evidence of official reports that pertained to the thefts before they occurred, as well as documentation that pertained to the identity theft issues ten years earlier. How's that for controlling the environment?

But we will proceed with the knowledge that the Internet is a hostile environment with many hazards for anyone targeted by law enforcement, as well as those of us who would like to maintain control over our accounts, the text associated with them and the attribution of hijacked accounts. I've already described, and documented, the fact that I was redirected to a counterfeit website where bogus phone records were displayed. The conspicuous effort to preclude comparison of those records with internal records made it clear that there was some red meat so to speak.

But prior to that I knew that phone service was redirected anyway. One of the reasons I established the account was to prove it, and it didn't take long before I found myself talking to people who had no idea where their company was located, or other basic information like the Time Zone where they were located, which resulted in some comical exchanges between myself and the alleged "representatives" of those companies or agencies. After the bogus phone records at the counterfeit site were noted, printed and brought to the attention of the representatives who became visibly perturbed and defensive, there was no point participating in the charade any longer, so I discontinued service.

Later, however, I had a very good reason to make a call because the Elder Abuse Hotline was the only means of doing so. I sent certified mail to Steve Cooley directly, but Adult Protective Services was the agency with jurisdiction over that matter. When I called APS, I was told to call another number for a "local" representative who would be handling the complaint. But instead of calling it, knowing from experience that it was futile, I did a Google search and found a location associated with that number. I decided to visit the address and see who was actually there, whether APS had an office there which seemed doubtful.

What I found was the office of an attorney who wasn't available to speak to, but hanging on the wall I saw a portrait photo, presumably including the female attorney, of several dozen military personnel in uniforms along with some other military memorabilia. Obviously, the phone number I had been given was not Adult Protective Services, nor was the office suitable for any such endeavor. But as if to add some comedy to the exercise, the people staffing the office told me that it was once used by Social Services which may have accounted for the mistake. (This is why the primary effort here is to separate the Bullshit from the Burgers).

At this point, 10:24 a.m. on August 31, 2011, I will save this post in the hope that the text will be preserved and continue with this post later.

© humble journalist

And in so doing, we were supplied with the proof of what is described above. When I tried to save and close the account, I got the following display instead:  

"Blogger: An error occurred. CONFLICTING EDITS. There was more than one attempt to edit this resource at the same time. This may have been because you double clicked on a link or a button or because someone else is also editing this blog or post. Please hit the back button on your browser and try again. If the problem persists, please contact the Blogger Help Group. We apologize for any inconvenience" 

And of course, the loyal Public Servant, the CLEO Stooge, the IT Tech who is controlling the server was at her terminal when it occurred, so the tug-of-war continues, the First Amendment another CLEO casualty. Most of the time I haven't actually witnessed it, but because of the configuration of the library, the personnel involved with illegal access are rather obvious. The printout of this message was made a few minutes after the above essay was posted and shows a time of 10:28 a.m. August 31, 2011. Thanks for the demo.

Missing Links

As a journalist, my attention continues to be on the missing W's, the Who and the Why, in almost every aspect of this sequence of events. For instance, why is it that CLEO stooges and military slime approach me to the point of it becoming a form of harassment? To illustrate the dichotomy here, I don't approach military slime, nor have I ever done so. I don't approach anyone as a matter of policy. But somehow, CLEO stooges and military slime always find a way to establish proximity for a photo-op or a recital or a complaint. Obviously, I have good reason to avoid military slime, but somehow wherever I go, once I sit down making myself an easy target, they show up. Why?

In my travels with Professor Peabody across the time frame of these essays, I came to realize that every person that proved to be affiliated with the military had made some sort of proactive effort to do so. I mentioned Lauren Smith earlier as a starting point, but when I was 15 years old the fact that her dad was in the U.S. Navy meant nothing to me. But as I began to write on these subjects in August 2007, it became apparent that the Who and Why were connected throughout. It has become equally apparent that concealing the identity of the complainants has been imperative to those who see those complaints and accusations as devices of expediency. That, of course, is no longer a mystery to me because I've observed military slime stalking me for no other reason than to make a complaint. I don't follow people into restrooms, especially unsupervised kids (which raises the question of why they were unsupervised in the first place. Not only in restrooms, but anywhere else that parents have a responsibility to protect or control their Mini-me's).

On the contrary, I avoid all public facilities unless it becomes a matter of necessity. America's Heroes, on the other hand, have often been seen hanging around for hours for an opportunity to follow me into these facilities to make their complaints. And since May 2007 the CLEO storyline that requires ambushes by kids, directed by cops and Dirtbag Dads, has been clearly directed and choreographed for specific reasons on a regular, and opportunistic basis. Again, the Who and the Why are the missing elements, and with few exceptions, the complainants that instigate Raid, Rummage and Ransack efforts, the nose-picking half-wits that remind me that I am obliged to tolerate harassment by CLEO stooges, the stalkers who approach me for staged photo-ops and recitals, and the military slime that just happen to always be around to supply law enforcement with complaints to support "Book-em Dan-O" Lasher's bogus arrest and booking report, are never identified. At least not to me. But CLEOs know who they are because these things are obviously staged.

I've named a few CLEO stooges here because it was easy to determine their status once I understood what specific purpose they served in the various CLEO scenarios. For instance, Carl Killian is the only person that can account for my whereabouts on July 14, 1994, which in retrospect I realize was part of the effort, part of the scam. But since I've put the pieces of that particular puzzle together, it also became apparent that to contend that I was transported to San Diego and arrested there is rather futile. Lasher put himself out on a limb in direct opposition to logic and reason, no one else. His narrative defeats itself and Officer Sullivan was exactly right in his assessment of the DA Scam. No further questions on that subject.

No one, especially the presiding judges involved, knew that Lasher's report was supposed to identify me as the person arrested on those occasions, nor were any of us aware that the DA Number Scam was in progress. There was never any mention of either contrivance in the proceedings or the records for good reason. These things were conspicuously concealed from myself and the judges involved, because both scams defied logical analysis from the beginning. To maintain otherwise, even after the thefts that occurred since, is ludicrous. So if Killian wants to support Lasher, he does so knowing that he is committing a crime, making a false statement regarding a official report, and perhaps perjury (if none of the participants accept the Polygraph Palooza challenge which would end this CLEO Comedy act once and for all).

But the same principle applies to all the complaints and complainants as well. They are committing criminal offenses when they arbitrarily make these complaints for transparently self-serving reasons or those of CLEO benefactors. The Who and the Why are not difficult to fathom, because motive supplies the answer to both questions, so often the complainants become visibly perturbed when they think I might be able to answer either question or both. For good reason as well, because if Ms. Honey for instance, did make a complaint that she appeared to be preparing when she became visibly upset at the prospect of being discovered, besides committing several other offenses using county property and becoming an accessory to offenses committed by those described here, she also committed slander, easily proven with the video available which would have certainly been under subpoena had such litigation taken place.

The same conditions exist for all of the falsified reports that have been made before and since then. The bogus complaints that caused the police responses that resulted in Raid, Rummage and Ransack incidents or specious citations, the falsified reports, the attacks on this account and the various forms of false attribution associated with the attacks, every dirt clod that was necessary to construct Mt. CLEO, the contrived stooge activities and harassment, and the coordination of these things by law enforcement officials who know exactly what I'm talking about here, is illegal.

When I used the analogy about the bank robbery I left out the possibility that the CLEO stooge may have been someone I knew, or someone that had approached me a few days earlier asking for a cigarette or proximity posing for the purpose of becoming an "associate" as so many CLEO stooges have. But if these people, or the theoretical bank robber do something illegal, CLEOs are reliant on the stooges keeping their knowledge of the scam to themselves for the rest of their lives, because the stooges, at least the ones I have seen or know about, are not the sort of people you want as your Star Witnesses; people that could sink your career and put you in jail when it became apparent their testimony constituted subornation of perjury. (Maybe that is why Michael E. Bartley asked for permission to leave the state in 1999 prior to his demise).

In fact, I don't think any of these people, especially CLEO stooges, would last very long in a courtroom environment because as I've pointed out on many occasions, the CLEO dike has many holes in it, many of them gaping chasms between falsified reports and simple applied logic. Taking into account that the self-serving motives and affiliations are rather obvious, I would relish the opportunity to engage in the proper journalistic processes associated with this sequence of events.

Red meat for journalists, but for the PMAPS and CLEOs involved a source of risk and concern because they know, I know, law enforcement knows, and the stooges know, they are full of shit. The various scams described here were clearly malicious and deliberative, as are those in progress, so the only question is whether someone like Carl Killian is dumb enough to crawl out on that limb with Lasher. The question becomes whether CLEO stooges can avoid direct questioning when they commit a criminal offense by lying about my conduct or activities, or contributing false information to a maliciously conceived police report.

This is the distinction between myself and those who I consider adversaries, between a journalist and a corrupt official or those with an agenda that includes a cover up. The odds are overwhelming, as are the volume of complaints and accusations, but the simple truth is no cause for concern from my perspective. Those that fear it are the people who have managed to conceal their identities, their motives, their affiliations, their collaborative efforts and their criminality to this point. Those elusive two W's define these people who have always been requisites for those with a motive to use their status and authority as a weapon and a shield against your humble writer. Without the answers to those questions, no equation can be complete, and for that reason an invalid representation. Journalists understand this, but apparently CLEOs and PMAPS do not. Or more likely, choose not to.  

© humble journalist 

After that, I'm guessing these assholes really don't like my attitude. Of course, I don't like theirs either.

Overview And Summation

Some of the implications of the various subjects discussed here are clearly within the realm, and the purview, of the judiciary, but not in the sense CLEOs would like. What, for instance, is the value or the purpose of laws pertaining to search and seizure when military slime is available to steal or corrupt personal property for the benefit of law enforcement? I have no remaining personal property that wasn't already accessed or confiscated by law enforcement, but the corruption that occurred was clearly the result of military slime tampering, hacking, switching, and in some cases handing me that which law enforcement would find expedient. The thefts perpetrated by military slime were clearly tactical in nature, and part of the various scams described here.

What is the purpose of laws pertaining to investigative authority, the sort obviated by the Patriot Act, when Corporate Stooges can create bogus phone or financial records without fear of criminal or civil liability? Like other CLEO stooges, they simply follow instructions, knowing that there is no legal authority supervising their activities, their methods or considering their motives. The first of the Corporate Stooges that I encountered was AT&T in June of 1997. I discovered that Michael E. Bartley had established phone and utility services using the fraudulent ID. I had the utilities disconnected, but AT&T refused to acknowledge or accept the court orders or the other evidence presented to them that I had not made the calls, or incurred the charges, they had allowed for when they established service. I was told that small claims court would not hear such a case, and wrote a letter of protest, but AT&T ignored all of the evidence and correspondence and like so many other people harmed by the felonious activities of DMV personnel, the unpaid bill became another example of the residual damage caused when fraudulent IDs are issued. (Of course, I didn't know at the time how that bill would actually become part of the scam described here, that those calls would also be attributed to me for reasons I didn't understand at the time. Since then I have become an expert on false attribution tactics by law enforcement, so AT&T must have had knowledge of the phony "profile" that law enforcement was trying to establish when they selected Michael E. Bartley to be the patsy and the vehicle for that profile to be falsely attributed to your humble writer).

There is also the issue of selective prosecution, or perhaps more accurately, criminality sponsored by law enforcement for their benefit. If the analogy presented in the previous essay has any merit, then law enforcement is essentially directing criminal activity, probably providing the props and "evidence" as well, which to me indicates not only complicity, but participation. When I reported the theft of my personal belongings the effort to disprove that the reports had ever occurred was amazing to watch, something like an emergency operator hanging up on you when you told them your house was burning down and your kids were trapped upstairs. "I'm sorry, we're busy right now. Try calling back later. Did you know we don't have to respond anyway according to the law?"

So what are the legal responsibilities of law enforcement anyway? I really don't know, but after I had gathered enough evidence to figure out how Lasher's narrative was intended to refer to your humble writer, but only after all of my property, records and identification had been stolen and my mother could no longer provide testimony, the reason became obvious. At that point I appealed to Mr. Cooley again, through Adult Protective Services and directly with correspondence, basically begging for medical assistance for my mother, and the assignment of some sort of medical professional to supervise her care, because John Andrew Whitcraft, Jr., with protection provided by Piece O' Shit "Fairlane" Ford, were preventing it. So it became obvious that the identity scam, perpetrated by "Book-em Dan-O" Lasher and Paul "Pffft" were connected, and it also became clear that to accomplish it, the perpetrators had carefully avoided judicial scrutiny when they falsified the reports and made the bogus database entries.

The alleged "residential burglary" for example, like the other bogus "arrests" described by Lasher, could not have been adjudicated at the time because the perpetrators knew they could easily be disproved. They couldn't bring any charges for the same reason, so Lasher's narrative becomes a comical rendition of what a real cop would ask a real perpetrator that admitted to a burglary. Lasher couldn't ask those questions, because he knew they would undermine the scam, and until all the evidence had been stolen or destroyed there was no way any part of that report could withstand scrutiny. In other words, law enforcement had a motive not to acknowledge the report of the thefts that contributed to that scam or the other forms of criminality associated with the misappropriation of those belongings. And they also had a motive to destroy the ID that was in my possession on May 4, 2007 when two military pieces of shit caused a police response which resulted in that ID being removed from my possession.

So there are a range of issues, from selective prosecution to equal protection to the violations of First and Fourth Amendment rights. All of the violations I've described reliant on the relationship, and the shared motives and interests of military personnel and law enforcement, many of whom were ex-military themselves. My experience, and one of the subjects I think is significant for consideration by the general population, is the consistent participation of military slime to commit what would otherwise be criminal offenses with the tacit approval, and in some cases the participation of law enforcement officials. Why do they get a pass, when some of the offenses that have been reported constitute serious felonies, some of which resulted in others that would not have been possible if simple, common law enforcement procedures had been followed. Like acknowledgement of a theft report, for instance.

If the judiciary can't or won't hear my arguments, or even see my presentation because of the barrier that exists at the window of the clerk, then it became apparent that the issues I intended to present to the judiciary should be considered by the general population. My grievances continue to this day, the same parties, hostile to my efforts for obvious reasons, using the same tactics of complaints and falsifications. Today's complaint or falsified police report is no different that those I wanted to present to the court four years ago. Today's assault, slander, theft or tampering are no different than those I described, and sought relief from, years ago. But without judicial review, these subjects are necessarily relegated to the public forum, and it appears that those I consider defendants will not be accountable either for their professional misconduct, criminality or responsible for financial losses associated with their conduct.

So the Accusing Fingers rule. Those that have a compelling interest to preclude judicial review of these issues and see the exercise of First Amendment rights as a threat, continue to use the same tactics, clearly intended to result in further losses of property, rights and freedoms described here. In other words, they don't give a f*** about any of those things as long as they can remain immune from culpability or liability. And unfortunately for myself and the rest of the population that doesn't live above the law, their aw-thor-i-tay has also provided the means of precluding these issues from being reviewed by the judiciary or even being discussed in the public forum.

The bogus complaints made against me since May 2007 are not only specious, but obviously intended to be overwhelming in volume, yet in no instance have they, or the complainants ever faced any sort of judicial scrutiny. So Mt. CLEO, the construct that is the manifestation of this strategy, an amalgamation of CLEO bullshit much of which was donated by military slime, is their shield as the Accusing Fingers continue to deflect attention from the clear and valid presentation I've made here and to the authorities with jurisdiction in the past.

© humble journalist