Missing Links

As a journalist, my attention continues to be on the missing W's, the Who and the Why, in almost every aspect of this sequence of events. For instance, why is it that CLEO stooges and military slime approach me to the point of it becoming a form of harassment? To illustrate the dichotomy here, I don't approach military slime, nor have I ever done so. I don't approach anyone as a matter of policy. But somehow, CLEO stooges and military slime always find a way to establish proximity for a photo-op or a recital or a complaint. Obviously, I have good reason to avoid military slime, but somehow wherever I go, once I sit down making myself an easy target, they show up. Why?

In my travels with Professor Peabody across the time frame of these essays, I came to realize that every person that proved to be affiliated with the military had made some sort of proactive effort to do so. I mentioned Lauren Smith earlier as a starting point, but when I was 15 years old the fact that her dad was in the U.S. Navy meant nothing to me. But as I began to write on these subjects in August 2007, it became apparent that the Who and Why were connected throughout. It has become equally apparent that concealing the identity of the complainants has been imperative to those who see those complaints and accusations as devices of expediency. That, of course, is no longer a mystery to me because I've observed military slime stalking me for no other reason than to make a complaint. I don't follow people into restrooms, especially unsupervised kids (which raises the question of why they were unsupervised in the first place. Not only in restrooms, but anywhere else that parents have a responsibility to protect or control their Mini-me's).

On the contrary, I avoid all public facilities unless it becomes a matter of necessity. America's Heroes, on the other hand, have often been seen hanging around for hours for an opportunity to follow me into these facilities to make their complaints. And since May 2007 the CLEO storyline that requires ambushes by kids, directed by cops and Dirtbag Dads, has been clearly directed and choreographed for specific reasons on a regular, and opportunistic basis. Again, the Who and the Why are the missing elements, and with few exceptions, the complainants that instigate Raid, Rummage and Ransack efforts, the nose-picking half-wits that remind me that I am obliged to tolerate harassment by CLEO stooges, the stalkers who approach me for staged photo-ops and recitals, and the military slime that just happen to always be around to supply law enforcement with complaints to support "Book-em Dan-O" Lasher's bogus arrest and booking report, are never identified. At least not to me. But CLEOs know who they are because these things are obviously staged.

I've named a few CLEO stooges here because it was easy to determine their status once I understood what specific purpose they served in the various CLEO scenarios. For instance, Carl Killian is the only person that can account for my whereabouts on July 14, 1994, which in retrospect I realize was part of the effort, part of the scam. But since I've put the pieces of that particular puzzle together, it also became apparent that to contend that I was transported to San Diego and arrested there is rather futile. Lasher put himself out on a limb in direct opposition to logic and reason, no one else. His narrative defeats itself and Officer Sullivan was exactly right in his assessment of the DA Scam. No further questions on that subject.

No one, especially the presiding judges involved, knew that Lasher's report was supposed to identify me as the person arrested on those occasions, nor were any of us aware that the DA Number Scam was in progress. There was never any mention of either contrivance in the proceedings or the records for good reason. These things were conspicuously concealed from myself and the judges involved, because both scams defied logical analysis from the beginning. To maintain otherwise, even after the thefts that occurred since, is ludicrous. So if Killian wants to support Lasher, he does so knowing that he is committing a crime, making a false statement regarding a official report, and perhaps perjury (if none of the participants accept the Polygraph Palooza challenge which would end this CLEO Comedy act once and for all).

But the same principle applies to all the complaints and complainants as well. They are committing criminal offenses when they arbitrarily make these complaints for transparently self-serving reasons or those of CLEO benefactors. The Who and the Why are not difficult to fathom, because motive supplies the answer to both questions, so often the complainants become visibly perturbed when they think I might be able to answer either question or both. For good reason as well, because if Ms. Honey for instance, did make a complaint that she appeared to be preparing when she became visibly upset at the prospect of being discovered, besides committing several other offenses using county property and becoming an accessory to offenses committed by those described here, she also committed slander, easily proven with the video available which would have certainly been under subpoena had such litigation taken place.

The same conditions exist for all of the falsified reports that have been made before and since then. The bogus complaints that caused the police responses that resulted in Raid, Rummage and Ransack incidents or specious citations, the falsified reports, the attacks on this account and the various forms of false attribution associated with the attacks, every dirt clod that was necessary to construct Mt. CLEO, the contrived stooge activities and harassment, and the coordination of these things by law enforcement officials who know exactly what I'm talking about here, is illegal.

When I used the analogy about the bank robbery I left out the possibility that the CLEO stooge may have been someone I knew, or someone that had approached me a few days earlier asking for a cigarette or proximity posing for the purpose of becoming an "associate" as so many CLEO stooges have. But if these people, or the theoretical bank robber do something illegal, CLEOs are reliant on the stooges keeping their knowledge of the scam to themselves for the rest of their lives, because the stooges, at least the ones I have seen or know about, are not the sort of people you want as your Star Witnesses; people that could sink your career and put you in jail when it became apparent their testimony constituted subornation of perjury. (Maybe that is why Michael E. Bartley asked for permission to leave the state in 1999 prior to his demise).

In fact, I don't think any of these people, especially CLEO stooges, would last very long in a courtroom environment because as I've pointed out on many occasions, the CLEO dike has many holes in it, many of them gaping chasms between falsified reports and simple applied logic. Taking into account that the self-serving motives and affiliations are rather obvious, I would relish the opportunity to engage in the proper journalistic processes associated with this sequence of events.

Red meat for journalists, but for the PMAPS and CLEOs involved a source of risk and concern because they know, I know, law enforcement knows, and the stooges know, they are full of shit. The various scams described here were clearly malicious and deliberative, as are those in progress, so the only question is whether someone like Carl Killian is dumb enough to crawl out on that limb with Lasher. The question becomes whether CLEO stooges can avoid direct questioning when they commit a criminal offense by lying about my conduct or activities, or contributing false information to a maliciously conceived police report.

This is the distinction between myself and those who I consider adversaries, between a journalist and a corrupt official or those with an agenda that includes a cover up. The odds are overwhelming, as are the volume of complaints and accusations, but the simple truth is no cause for concern from my perspective. Those that fear it are the people who have managed to conceal their identities, their motives, their affiliations, their collaborative efforts and their criminality to this point. Those elusive two W's define these people who have always been requisites for those with a motive to use their status and authority as a weapon and a shield against your humble writer. Without the answers to those questions, no equation can be complete, and for that reason an invalid representation. Journalists understand this, but apparently CLEOs and PMAPS do not. Or more likely, choose not to.  

© humble journalist 

After that, I'm guessing these assholes really don't like my attitude. Of course, I don't like theirs either.