Pageviews

PMAPS Attack: Name The Perp

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Is It Something I Said? (Part III)

As I've watched the stooge activity noting the costumes that are obviously integral to the efforts of CLEOs, I often wonder whether my amusement is shared by those with an IQ greater than those that direct the dirtbags, posers, and others who obviously don't have a lot to do besides function as CLEO stooges. It also became obvious a long time ago that there were more dirtbags available to function as CLEO stooges than there were ways to avoid them. The conundrum lies in the fact that these people can approach me any time that serves CLEO purposes and like anyone else, I am obliged to eat, sleep and use a restroom occasionally without the benefit of access to private property. This means that all of the places that are compelling as far as survival become points of attack for CLEO stooges.

Just before I sat down to write this essay, a CLEO Clown in the usual Mr. Blackwell get-up, seemed to be following me after I changed directions and my choice of destinations. An hour later, the same guy showed up several miles away performing the same act despite the fact he was last seen going in the opposite direction thinking that my expected destination would be elsewhere. How did he know I changed course and wound up several miles away? You'll have to ask the cops because they crossed my path several times before the street cams picked me up, and by the time I arrived at the unexpected destination (somewhere other than a library or a crummy fast food establishment where I am obliged to frequent due to financial restrictions), several more CLEO stooges in Mr. Blackwell outfits were already in place, one actually blocking the door so as to affect a proximity pose without my willing participation.

Now the "secret code" aspect of  this has always fascinated me for the simple reason it's so utterly stupid. Only someone stuck on stupid would come up with such a scenario that is necessarily played out in public in front of surveillance cameras, cops who record this stuff, street cams and regularly found in places where I am obliged to visit to survive. These affectations as mentioned previously, have occurred thousands of times, obviously staged, and comical in the sense that the bad actors involved sometimes have to risk their lives to accomplish the proximity poses and to make cell calls in my vicinity. What is the destination of those calls anyway? I've never uttered a word to any of these people except to occasionally tell them to get lost, never handed them a "secret note" or anything else that would be required to convey anything. Yet the affectations continue because any asshole, like the one who just sat down next to me in a Mr. Blackwell get-up, can affect the ridiculous motions that are obviously for the benefit of CLEO directors.

I know this account, and in fact any Internet-based account I've ever used, became controlled by CLEO-friendlies as soon as I logged-in because the servers are controlled by the same parties that have a compelling interest in doing so without fear of prosecution, the same as any other CLEO stooge or proxy. So CLEOs, in their efforts to connect the dots that make it appear that some sort of illegal activity is always going on around me, also control the dots. They direct the dots. They tell the dots what to say. They tell the dots what to wear. They tell the dots where to go and when. They pay the dots. So the 17,520 instances I referred to earlier are predictable in the sense that all CLEOs need is the motive to orchestrate and choreograph these things which they most certainly do, so the Who and Why have always remained a closely-guarded CLEO secret. (The asshole I referred to above properly established proximity in his Mr. Blackwell outfit and has proceeded to affect his performance in front of police surveillance parked in front, so you can make that 17,521 staged portrayals which is a ridiculously conservative number.)

In the absence of contraband or money, I can only assume that the portrayals, along with whatever alleged "credibility" CLEOs enjoy by way of their status, is enough to make all of this crap worthwhile. To them, that is, but unfortunately every time I think the worst of these antics is behind me, another stooge-stampede overshadows the previous world record. (The current record for dirtbag-stalkers converging on an empty restroom until I entered it remains at fourteen). So I am continually asking myself, how does any of this translate into enforcing the law? It doesn't unless you understand that CLEOs have a compelling interest in finding a means of using their authority, their only asset because judicial review has been conspicuously avoided, as a device to cover up professional misconduct described here.

To emphasize the point, we'll add a poll to this essay which will also serve as a Pop Quiz for those who have actually read all of the essays. Who has the most to gain, the most to cover up, or put another way, the most to lose by not finding a way to use prosecutorial authority to cover up the misdeeds described here? The Feds? The State of California? The County of Los Angeles? The County of San Diego? Or the "Field" which includes every other jurisdiction that I may have passed through since reporting theft of my belongings to the Sierra Madre Police Department in May of 2007? Keep in mind that Igor and Whitcraft are both "Feds" as are Kurt Zimmerman and John Vandevelde. All of the military slime are "Feds" as well along with characters like Bill Bogaard, Mayor of Pasadena, and most of the law enforcement personnel who we learned were also ex-military.

Remember also that the County of San Diego has been instrumental, not only in bogus databases entries which I found out later were pretty much routine as far as PMAPS were concerned, but the DA Number Scam which is purely a construct of the CLEO Alternate Universe. (In other words, it makes no f***ing sense and was obviously malicious and deliberative). The County of Los Angeles has also demonstrated a propensity for extra-Constitutional activities, among them most of the examples of illegal access, confiscation, falsifications and collaboration with the primary perpetrators. I also have a suspicion that Steve Cooley is probably less than thrilled with my analysis and commentary.

So here we go! Who will "Pin the Tale" on your humble writer? Of course, we have no way of knowing what the "Tale" might be, but I don't think the PMAPS really give a shit at this point, especially when they know they have tens of thousands of stooges, and almost 30 million Military Thugs and Hags out there to support them in their ongoing attacks on the U.S. Constitution, the First and Fourth Amendments, Equal Protection clause, and the alleged Rule of Law as it pertains to non-CLEOs who are less than enamored with the track record of America's Heroes and their antics (read criminal conduct) here in the Homeland. Eskimo Pie to anyone who can prove they cast the winning vote!

© humble journalist

No comments:

Post a Comment