Return Of Essay 29

Report of Misconduct

Federal Bureau of Investigation; Andre Birotte, U.S. Attorney for CACD; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General for the State of California; Steven Cooley, District Attorney, County of Los Angeles.


I herewith allege the following:


That on or about June 8, 2010 and again on June 11, 2010 and on several occasions since, State of California employees committed theft of court documents and exhibits to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California at the at the California Employment Development Department offices (EDD) in Pasadena.


That on or about June 28, 2010, State of California employees redirected phone service to an official agency, misdirected a fax report required to for the business of the U.S. District Court, an official report of misconduct against their office and personnel, and illegally accessed account information and documents, with the deliberative intent of interfering with litigation against the State of California, the City of Pasadena and sub-agencies and others named as defendants, in violation of the Rules and Procedures of the U.S. District Court and the U.S. Code.


That on or about July 6, 2010 and again on July 8, 2010, State of California employees did maliciously attack and corrupt storage media, illegally accessed personal accounts, corrupted and/or disabled those account with malicious intent, and committed theft of property; specifically original document “Addendum to Complaint” and printed copy of  “13. Ceast and Desist” exhibit to the U.S. District Court, with malicious intent and in violation of provisions of the U.S. Code specified below.


That on or about July 25, 2010 State of California employees directed proxies to handle court documents, exhibits and other articles and materials for the purpose of intimidation and harassment, and possibly the theft of those items, as well as to prevent access to the public facilities necessary for access to the courts and the business, rules and procedures of those courts.


That these acts constitute violations of §§ Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245.


Dated: July 29, 2010

This essay somehow disappeared, then reappeared after it was posted on the date above. As far as I know, there was no malicious code because nothing was pasted into it, but by that time my flash-drive I used to store documents had been corrupted (and remains that way). When Essay 30 became a "Duplicate" it was for the simple reason that the rather sophisticated parties that can accomplish that feat also have the capacity to hack the account, and replaced the original Essay 30 with the "Duplicate" which was referred to earlier. They had to. Because had that document not been replaced the code that was used to corrupt my flash drive would have been posted on the Internet, easily decipherable to anyone with the expertise to analyze the code.

While I understand the tactics, the techniques and especially the motives and the parties that are obviously hostile to my journalistic endeavors, it remains a mystery as to what can be done to stop them. I've noted the constant, incessant attacks on this account for instance, but on the occasions I have attempted to deal with these things with the reporting mechanisms available, there has been no legitimate reply. "Hey, Google, my e-mail account is so corrupted no one gets my e-mails, and if I ever get a reply it is a year or more later after I post the original e-mail on the Internet. What to do?" And guess what? I've never gotten a reply from Google either, which isn't to say they ever received it, because the account is only usable to the extent that the servers and the IT Techs and the 14 or so points where packets are exchanged allow for it. You don't complain about your handset phone when you know the lines are down. It ain't the phone.

But the essays as I've emphasized before, were intended to compensate for the lack of response by law enforcement officials with jurisdiction to legitimate reports of criminality. Since it became obvious that those reports also referred to crimes in progress, I thought it was worthwhile to do everything I could to communicate the information using whatever means possible. I knew those who had put so much effort into avoiding acknowledgment of the reports might see it as antagonistic on my part, but there has never been any malice intended in my lawful and rather routine efforts to make official reports to those with jurisdiction.

On the contrary, I knew that when that much in the way of personal belongings ends up in the hands of people who will do anything to cover up their criminality, I was in serious jeopardy. And it wasn't long before I realized that my assessment was correct. That property began to show up in places that were clearly intended to incriminate me in crimes I had nothing to do with. It was clearly transported for that purpose. It was passed around by law enforcement officials in different jurisdictions, and I've never had any means of recovering it or even making a report of it.

To me, that is all screwed up, especially when one considers that potential consequences for your humble writer as I watched my remaining possessions disappear or become similar vehicles for corruption or misplacement by the officials that confiscated, (or simply stole) them using color of authority. So it got to the point where I basically said "Who the f*** do these people think they are anyway?" The answer, of course, was obvious. They are the people who can steal your mail, redirect your phone calls and make sure you never send or receive an e-mail. They are the people who can access your blog anytime they want and make any sort of alterations or deletions that suits their purposes. They are the people who can make database entries to produce a printout that shows that you have a longer record than Al Capone. That's who they are, and collectively the PMAPS have a shitload of power and authority.

So what to do? Well, without the funds to do much of anything besides describe my experience, that has been the only thing possible. And until someone in the law enforcement community acknowledges these report, as well as the other things I have not mentioned here, then I'm more or less obligated to point out how these things have directly effected me. (And that that doesn't even count the Access and Corruption that I am aware of that occurred when law enforcement gained possession of my remaining possessions). But hey, we're all adults here and journalism is what it is. Bullshit is what it is. And malicious code does what it does. So I will continue to address these issues to the best of ability for the benefit of the judiciary, the general population and for my own amusement.

© humble journalist